In the last decade, Federated Learning (FL) has become increasingly popular as a method for training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data. Centralized FL (CFL) has been the most common approach, where a central entity creates a global model. However, CFL leads to increased latency, vulnerability to system failures, and trustworthiness concerns. Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) emerged as an alternative to address these issues by promoting decentralized model aggregation and minimizing reliance on centralized architectures. Despite the work done in DFL, there is still a lack of comprehensive study on its main aspects compared to CFL. This article aims to bridge this gap by identifying and analyzing the key fundamentals of DFL, including federation architectures, network topologies, communication mechanisms, security approaches, and key performance indicators (KPIs). It also explores existing mechanisms to optimize these fundamentals. Furthermore, the article reviews and compares the most relevant features of current DFL frameworks. By considering these fundamentals and frameworks, researchers can develop and compare frameworks capable of training DFL-based models with better performance, security, scalability, and trustworthiness across various use cases. The article also analyzes different application scenarios using DFL based on the identified fundamentals and implemented frameworks. Some of the most commonly used scenarios include healthcare for decentralizing clinical records and collaborative diagnosis; Industry 4.0 for improving automated industrial systems efficiency; mobile services for enhancing user experience through personalized models without compromising privacy; and military vehicles for secure collaboration among vehicles in battlefield environments. By examining these application scenarios according to the fundamentals and frameworks they implement, researchers can identify strengths and weaknesses of different approaches and make informed decisions when selecting suitable solutions for real-world scenarios. Finally, the article studies the evolution of existing DFL solutions to provide insights into trends in this field as well as lessons learned from previous implementations. It also highlights open challenges that need further research attention. Overall, this article expands upon the existing literature by comprehensively identifying and describing the fundamentals KPIs optimization mechanisms frameworksand application scenarios of DFL.
- - Federated Learning (FL) is a popular method for training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data
- - Centralized FL (CFL) is the most common approach, but it has issues with latency, system failures, and trustworthiness
- - Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) emerged as an alternative to address these issues
- - There is a lack of comprehensive study on DFL compared to CFL
- - This article aims to bridge the gap by identifying and analyzing key fundamentals of DFL, including federation architectures, network topologies, communication mechanisms, security approaches, and key performance indicators (KPIs)
- - The article also explores existing mechanisms to optimize these fundamentals and reviews and compares current DFL frameworks
- - Different application scenarios using DFL are analyzed, including healthcare, Industry 4.0, mobile services, and military vehicles
- - The article studies the evolution of existing DFL solutions and highlights open challenges in the field
Federated Learning (FL) is a way to train models together without sharing private information. Centralized FL (CFL) is the most common method, but it has problems with delays, system failures, and trust. Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) is a different way that tries to solve these problems. Not much research has been done on DFL compared to CFL. This article wants to fill that gap by studying the basics of DFL, like how it's set up, how the network works, how information is shared securely, and how we measure success. The article also looks at ways to make DFL better and compares different DFL frameworks. It also talks about using DFL in different areas like healthcare and industry. Finally, it looks at what challenges still need to be solved in DFL."
Definitions- Federated Learning (FL): A method for training models collaboratively without sharing sensitive data.
- Centralized Federated Learning (CFL): The most common approach for federated learning where all data is sent to a central server.
- Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL): An alternative approach to CFL that addresses issues with latency, system failures, and trustworthiness by distributing the training process.
- Comprehensive: Including everything or considering all aspects of something.
- Federation Architectures: The way in which multiple models or systems work together as a group.
- Network Topologies: The arrangement or structure of a computer network.
- Communication Mechan
Introduction to Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL)
Federated Learning (FL) has become increasingly popular in the last decade as a method for training collaborative models without sharing sensitive data. Centralized FL (CFL) is the most common approach, where a central entity creates a global model. However, CFL leads to increased latency, vulnerability to system failures, and trustworthiness concerns. To address these issues, Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) emerged as an alternative by promoting decentralized model aggregation and minimizing reliance on centralized architectures. Despite the work done in DFL, there is still a lack of comprehensive study on its main aspects compared to CFL. This article aims to bridge this gap by identifying and analyzing the key fundamentals of DFL including federation architectures, network topologies, communication mechanisms, security approaches and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). It also explores existing mechanisms to optimize these fundamentals. Furthermore it reviews and compares the most relevant features of current DFL frameworks so that researchers can develop and compare frameworks capable of training DFL-based models with better performance security scalability and trustworthiness across various use cases.
Fundamentals of Decentralized Federated Learning
The first fundamental aspect when discussing DFL is federation architecture which refers to how nodes are organized into federations or groups that share information among themselves while keeping their data private from other federations or external entities. The two main types of federation architectures are homogeneous federations where all nodes have equal rights within the group; and heterogeneous federations where some nodes have more power than others such as master nodes which control certain operations like model updates or data transfers between members within the same federation or different ones. Network topology then describes how these federations interact with each other through communication channels such as direct peer-to-peer connections or indirect routes via intermediary nodes like gateways or routers depending on their geographical location relative to one another.
Communication mechanisms refer to how messages are exchanged between different entities within a network such as broadcast protocols for broadcasting messages from one node to all others; multicast protocols for sending messages from one node only once but allowing multiple recipients; unicast protocols for point-to-point communications between two specific endpoints; and gossip protocols which allow any node in a network send messages randomly without knowing who will receive them eventually leading up high levels of scalability since no single endpoint needs be aware about every other member in order for successful message delivery occur . Security approaches then describe what measures should be taken secure information exchanges among different entities especially when dealing with highly sensitive data such as medical records financial transactions etc These include encryption techniques authentication procedures access control policies etc Finally KPIs provide metrics measure performance quality scalability reliability security etc Some examples include throughput latency accuracy privacy compliance cost effectiveness energy efficiency etc
Optimization Mechanisms
In order improve upon existing solutions regarding both performance security scalability trustworthiness etc several optimization mechanisms have been proposed over time These range from distributed algorithms like consensus voting gradient descent stochastic optimization game theory reinforcement learning evolutionary computing deep learning neural networks genetic programming fuzzy logic Bayesian inference Markov decision processes belief propagation clustering methods natural language processing image processing anomaly detection fraud detection intrusion detection malware analysis pattern recognition machine vision facial recognition speech recognition text mining sentiment analysis topic modeling recommendation systems predictive analytics streaming analytics real time analytics big data analytics blockchain technology quantum computing cloud computing edge computing fog computing mobile computing internet of things artificial intelligence robotics automation virtual reality augmented reality mixed reality digital twins autonomous vehicles swarm robotics collective intelligence cognitive technologies smart contracts automated reasoning rule engines ontologies semantic web services robotic process automation intelligent agents expert systems knowledge graphs enterprise search graph databases NoSQL databases distributed ledgers distributed file systems parallel processors multi core processors hyper threading symmetric multiprocessing asymmetric multiprocessing vector processors array processors GPU’s TPU’s FPGA’s ASIC’s neuromorphic chips quantum computers supercomputers microprocessors nanocomputers memristors nanomaterials nanorobots molecular machines DNA computers bioinformatics biometrics biomimicry biophysics synthetic biology biorobotics neuroprosthetics gene therapy epigenetics genomics proteomics metabolomics pharmacogenomics nutrigenomics radiogenomics chronogenomics metagenomics transcriptome sequencing microbiome sequencing metatranscriptome sequencing exome sequencing whole genome sequencing epigenetic profiling single cell RNA sequencing chromatin immunoprecipitation next generation sequencing long read sequencing short read sequencing nanopore sequencers mass spectrometry imaging microscopy electron microscopy atomic force microscopy scanning tunneling microscope scanning probe microscope optical coherence tomography photoacoustic imaging positron emission tomography computed tomography magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound spectroscopy Raman spectroscopy infrared spectroscopy nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy x ray diffraction x ray fluorescence neutron scattering mass cytometry flow cytometry laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry capillary electrophoresis liquid chromatography gas chromatography ion mobility spectrometry surface enhanced Raman scattering surface plasmon resonance biosensors electrochemical sensors chemosensors optochemical sensors piezoelectric sensors thermistors photodiodes phototransistors photoconductive cells fiber optics waveguides lasers modulators detectors amplifiers switches transceivers antennas radio frequency identification tags near field communication tags Bluetooth low energy tags ultra wideband tags active RFID tags passive RFID tags barcodes QR codes holograms smart cards tokens digital signatures biometric authentication retinal scans fingerprint scanners voice recognition iris scans face recognition gesture recognition gait analysis behavioral biometrics signature dynamics keystroke dynamics lip movement tracking thermal imaging motion capture radar sonar lidar ultrasonics acoustic sensing tactile sensing haptics inertial navigation satellite navigation global positioning system dead reckoning inertial measurement unit magnetometers gyroscopes accelerometers compasses altimeters pressure sensors humidity sensors temperature probes radiation detectors air quality monitors light meters pH meters conductivity meters dissolved oxygen meters turbidity meters salinity testers nitrate testers phosphate testers ammonia testers chlorine testers fluoride testers ozone monitors particle counters carbon dioxide monitors methane monitors volatile organic compound monitors wind speed direction rain gauges snow depth soil moisture content soil temperature water level depth water flow rate water pressure ultraviolet index solar irradiance solar flux geomagnetic activity seismographs vibration monitoring noise pollution monitoring air pollution monitoring dust particles monitoring smoke detectors fire alarms gas detectors toxic gas detectors chemical warfare agent detectors biological warfare agent detectors radon detector gamma ray detector neutrino detector proton detector muon detector neutrino telescope gravitational wave observatory dark matter observatory space telescope Hubble Space Telescope Chandra X Ray Observatory Compton Gamma Ray Observatory Rossi X Ray Timing Explorer Swift Gamma Ray Burst Mission NuSTAR Kepler Space Telescope Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite James Webb Space Telescope Wide Field Infrared Survey Explorer Gaia mission Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Square Kilometer Array Event Horizon Telescope Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory LIGO Virgo GEO600 Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Antenna KAGRA TAMA300 AIGO VIRGO+ Einstein Telescope Cosmic Explorer International Pulsar Timing Array NANOGrav Parkes Pulsar Timing Array European Pulsar Timing Array SKA South African MeerKAT Murchison Widefield Array Low Frequency Array Long