Challenges in creative generative models for music: a divergence maximization perspective

AI-generated keywords: Generative ML Creative Output Computational Creativity Divergence Maximization Evaluation Method

AI-generated Key Points

  • Generative machine learning models have gained interest in creative practices
  • Usability and availability of pre-trained models have enabled their use in artistic domains
  • Limitations exist in current evaluation methods used by scientists
  • Models are still unable to generate content outside of the training dataset domain
  • "Challenges in Creative Generative Models for Music: A Divergence Maximization Perspective" proposes a new framework for ML objectives
  • The proposed framework aims to address lack of creativity in existing generative models by maximizing divergence between generated outputs and training data while taking into account conditioning variables that contextualize generation
  • CC-inspired evaluation method suggested to promote creative output from generative models
  • Proposed framework can facilitate better integration of these techniques into artistic domains while promoting more diverse and innovative outputs beyond those defined by training datasets.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Axel Chemla--Romeu-Santos, Philippe Esling

to be published in AI Music Creativity Conference proceedings (AIMC2022)
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: The development of generative Machine Learning (ML) models in creative practices, enabled by the recent improvements in usability and availability of pre-trained models, is raising more and more interest among artists, practitioners and performers. Yet, the introduction of such techniques in artistic domains also revealed multiple limitations that escape current evaluation methods used by scientists. Notably, most models are still unable to generate content that lay outside of the domain defined by the training dataset. In this paper, we propose an alternative prospective framework, starting from a new general formulation of ML objectives, that we derive to delineate possible implications and solutions that already exist in the ML literature (notably for the audio and musical domain). We also discuss existing relations between generative models and computational creativity and how our framework could help address the lack of creativity in existing models.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Nov. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2211.08856v1

The development of generative machine learning (ML) models in creative practices has gained significant interest among artists, practitioners, and performers. Recent improvements in the usability and availability of pre-trained models have enabled the use of these techniques in artistic domains. However, the introduction of such techniques has also revealed multiple limitations that escape current evaluation methods used by scientists. Notably, most models are still unable to generate content that lay outside of the domain defined by the training dataset. In this paper titled "Challenges in Creative Generative Models for Music: A Divergence Maximization Perspective," Axel Chemla-Romeu-Santos and Philippe Esling propose an alternative prospective framework starting from a new general formulation of ML objectives. The authors derive this framework to delineate possible implications and solutions that already exist in the ML literature, notably for the audio and musical domain. The proposed framework aims to address the lack of creativity in existing generative models by maximizing divergence between generated outputs and training data while taking into account conditioning variables that contextualize generation. The authors suggest using a CC-inspired evaluation method to promote creative output from generative models. The paper discusses existing relations between generative models and computational creativity, highlighting how their proposed framework could help overcome current limitations faced by generative ML models. By providing a more comprehensive evaluation method for generative models' creative output, this framework can facilitate better integration of these techniques into artistic domains while promoting more diverse and innovative outputs beyond those defined by training datasets. Overall, this paper presents an important contribution towards advancing creative applications of generative ML models while addressing current limitations faced by these techniques in artistic domains.
Created on 14 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.