Fundamental Limits to Expressive Capacity of Finitely Sampled Qubit-Based Systems
AI-generated Key Points
- Quantum machine learning (QML) shows promise for data-driven applications
- Qubit-based systems have limited expressive capacity due to quantum sampling noise
- Framework developed to quantify expressive capacity using projective measurements
- Tight bound on expressive capacity and accuracy limit calculated and compared to experiments
- Low-noise eigentasks improve performance in classification tasks, robust to noise and overfitting
- Entanglement enhances learning capacity by reducing noise in eigentasks
- Implications for quantum machine learning and sensing applications
- Understanding limitations of quantum sampling noise can enhance performance and reliability
Authors: Fangjun Hu, Gerasimos Angelatos, Saeed A. Khan, Marti Vives, Esin Türeci, Leon Bello, Graham E. Rowlands, Guilhem J. Ribeill, Hakan E. Türeci
Abstract: The expressive capacity for learning with quantum systems is fundamentally limited by the quantum sampling noise incurred during measurement. While studies suggest that noise limits the resolvable capacity of quantum systems, its precise impact on learning remains an open question. We develop a framework for quantifying the expressive capacity of qubit-based systems from finite numbers of projective measurements, and calculate a tight bound on the expressive capacity and the corresponding accuracy limit that we compare to experiments on superconducting quantum processors. We uncover the native function set a finitely-sampled quantum system can approximate, called eigentasks. We then demonstrate how low-noise eigentasks improve performance for tasks such as classification in a way that is robust to noise and overfitting. We also present experimental and numerical analyses suggesting that entanglement enhances learning capacity by reducing noise in eigentasks. Our results are broadly relevant to quantum machine learning and sensing applications.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.