Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.00091v1

Historian Sheidel has observed that throughout human history, economic inequality has decreased in times of wars, revolutions, collapse of states, and epidemics. Currently, the world is facing various crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, war in Ukraine, and natural disasters caused by global warming. While these crises are unfortunate, they may accelerate the arrival of a new mode of exchange and facilitate the transition from a capitalist economy to alternatives suggested by Graeber and Karatani. To address the urgent need to identify the mode of wealth exchange through which worldwide wealth inequality arises, this study compares an equivalent market exchange with redistribution based on power centers and a nonequivalent exchange with mutual aid using Polanyi, Graeber, and Karatani modes of exchange. The study reconstructs two new exchange models based on multi-agent interactions following an econophysics approach for evaluating inequality (Gini index) and economic flow (total exchange). The simulations indicate that the evaluation parameter of total exchange divided by Gini index can be expressed by the same saturated curvilinear approximate equation using transfer rate and time period of redistribution along with surplus contribution rate of wealthy individuals and saving rate. However, considering coercion associated with taxes and independence based on morality of mutual aid, a nonequivalent exchange without return obligation is preferred. This aligns with Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D while also having implications for alternatives to capitalist economy. While this study provides valuable insights into general trends in redistribution and mutual aid models for addressing wealth inequality issues worldwide; it has limitations such as setting transfer rates uniformly across all agents in equivalent market exchanges model (EX) or setting surplus contribution rates uniformly across all agents in nonequivalent exchanges model (NX). Future analytical studies should consider different transfer rates based on social security programs or varying surplus contribution rates according to ability/needs. Moreover, empirical studies are needed to examine real-world evidence of the relationship between economic flow and Gini index with respect to tax rate/frequency for EX model and stock/surplus contribution of wealthy individuals for NX model. Additionally, this study uses a conservative model that only deals with exchange and not production/consumption or interest/profit-loss in real-world economy. Future studies could consider redistribution/mutual aid of interest/profit-loss for wealthy/poor individuals using non-conservative models such as those introduced by Kato in comparison of Islamic and capitalist economies. Finally, while this study used a kinetic energy exchange analogy-based model there are other models such as potential function-based probability distributions for income/expenditure or population dynamics-based time developments for growth/inequality that future research could explore. Non-conservative models must consider resource limits' constraints however eventually returning to a conservative model primarily based on exchange.

• - Historian Sheidel has observed that economic inequality decreases during times of wars, revolutions, collapse of states, and epidemics
• - Current crises such as COVID-19 pandemic, war in Ukraine, and natural disasters caused by global warming may accelerate the arrival of a new mode of exchange and facilitate the transition from a capitalist economy to alternatives suggested by Graeber and Karatani
• - This study compares an equivalent market exchange with redistribution based on power centers and a nonequivalent exchange with mutual aid using Polanyi, Graeber, and Karatani modes of exchange
• - The simulations indicate that the evaluation parameter of total exchange divided by Gini index can be expressed by the same saturated curvilinear approximate equation using transfer rate and time period of redistribution along with surplus contribution rate of wealthy individuals and saving rate
• - A nonequivalent exchange without return obligation is preferred due to coercion associated with taxes and independence based on morality of mutual aid. This aligns with Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D while also having implications for alternatives to capitalist economy.
• - Limitations include setting transfer rates uniformly across all agents in equivalent market exchanges model (EX) or setting surplus contribution rates uniformly across all agents in nonequivalent exchanges model (NX)
• - Future analytical studies should consider different transfer rates based on social security programs or varying surplus contribution rates according to ability/needs. Empirical studies are needed to examine real-world evidence.
• - Future studies could consider redistribution/mutual aid of interest/profit-loss for wealthy/poor individuals using non-conservative models such as those introduced by Kato in comparison of Islamic and capitalist economies.
• - Other models such as potential function-based probability distributions for income/expenditure or population dynamics-based time developments for growth/inequality could be explored. Non-conservative models must consider resource limits' constraints however eventually returning to a conservative model primarily based on exchange.

Summary: Wars, revolutions, collapse of states, and epidemics can decrease economic inequality. Current crises like COVID-19 pandemic, war in Ukraine, and natural disasters may lead to a new way of exchanging goods instead of capitalism. A study compared different ways of exchange and found that mutual aid without return obligation is preferred over market exchange with taxes. The study suggests varying transfer rates and surplus contribution rates for future studies. Other models could be explored but must consider resource limits. Definitions- Historian: a person who studies history - Economic inequality: the unequal distribution of wealth or resources among individuals or groups - Capitalist economy: an economic system based on private ownership of property and the means of production, with profit being the main driving force - Mutual aid: voluntary assistance provided by individuals or groups to each other without expectation of return - Gini index: a measure of income inequality within a population - Coercion: using force or threats to make someone do something they don't want to do - Empirical studies: research based on observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic - Conservative model: an economic model that emphasizes maintaining stability and avoiding risk-taking

Exploring the Relationship between Wealth Inequality and Exchange Models

The world is currently facing a multitude of crises, from global pandemics to wars and natural disasters. While these are unfortunate events, they may provide an opportunity for a new mode of exchange that could reduce economic inequality worldwide. This research paper by Sheidel explores the relationship between wealth inequality and various exchange models in order to identify which mode of exchange would be most effective at addressing this issue. The study compares equivalent market exchanges with redistribution based on power centers, as well as nonequivalent exchanges with mutual aid using Polanyi, Graeber, and Karatani modes of exchange.

Equivalent Market Exchanges (EX) Model

In the EX model, agents interact through an econophysics approach for evaluating inequality (Gini index) and economic flow (total exchange). Simulations indicate that total exchange divided by Gini index can be expressed by the same saturated curvilinear approximate equation using transfer rate and time period of redistribution along with surplus contribution rate of wealthy individuals and saving rate. However, this model has some limitations such as setting transfer rates uniformly across all agents or setting surplus contribution rates uniformly across all agents.

Nonequivalent Exchanges (NX) Model

The NX model aligns with Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D while also having implications for alternatives to capitalist economy. It does not require return obligation but rather relies on morality-based mutual aid without coercion associated with taxes. However, it also has its own set of limitations such as only dealing with exchange rather than production/consumption or interest/profit-loss in real-world economy or setting stock/surplus contribution rates uniformly across all agents regardless of ability/needs.

Implications & Future Research

This study provides valuable insights into general trends in redistribution and mutual aid models for addressing wealth inequality issues worldwide; however further research is needed to explore different transfer rates based on social security programs or varying surplus contribution rates according to ability/needs empirically in real-world scenarios. Additionally, non-conservative models should consider resource limits' constraints eventually returning to a conservative model primarily based on exchange while exploring potential function-based probability distributions for income/expenditure or population dynamics-based time developments for growth/inequality among other possibilities offered by Kato’s comparison between Islamic economies versus capitalist ones when considering redistribution/mutual aid related to interest/profit-loss for wealthy individuals versus poor ones respectively .