Better Balance in Informatics: An Honest Discussion with Students

AI-generated keywords: Gender Balance Computer Science Better Balance in Informatics Mentorship Programs Supportive Community

AI-generated Key Points

  • There is still a gender gap in all levels of Computer Science academia.
  • The Department of Computer Science at UiT The Arctic University of Norway organized structured discussions with students to identify points of intervention that could increase gender balance among incoming CS students, current CS students, and those interested in entering CS academia.
  • Two female student project assistants were hired to reach out to their fellow students and promote the Better Balance in Informatics (BBI) agenda.
  • Various means were employed to advertise BBI discussion sessions including posting advertisements on department monitors and social networks, Canvas, UiT calendar, local student organization forums such as Discord server maintained by TD.
  • Recommendations were made to the administration of the department along with a roadmap that other institutions could follow when organizing similar events as part of their gender-balance action plan.
  • Encourage more female participation at an early stage by providing mentorship opportunities or creating outreach programs targeted towards girls in middle school or high school who may be interested in pursuing CS.
  • Create a more inclusive and supportive study environment for CS majors by providing mentorship programs, organizing networking events, and promoting diversity in hiring practices.
  • Provide more opportunities for research experience and funding as well as creating a supportive community that encourages women to pursue academic careers in CS.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Elisavet Kozyri, Mariel Evelyn Markussen Ellingsen, Ragnhild Abel Grape, Letizia Jaccheri

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: In recent years, there has been considerable effort to promote gender balance in the academic environment of Computer Science (CS). However, there is still a gender gap at all CS academic levels: from students, to PhD candidates, to faculty members. This general trend is followed by the Department of Computer Science at UiT The Arctic University of Norway. To combat this trend within the CS environment at UiT, we embarked on structured discussions with students of our department. After analyzing the data collected from these discussions, we were able to identify action items that could mitigate the existing gender gap at our department. In particular, these discussions elucidated ways to achieve (i) a balanced flow of students into CS undergraduate program, (ii) a balanced CS study environment, and (iii) a balanced flow of graduates into higher levels of the CS academia (e.g., PhD program). This paper presents the results of the discussions and the subsequent recommendations that we made to the administration of the department. We also provide a road-map that other institutions could follow to organize similar events as part of their gender-balance action plan.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.02532v1

In recent years, there have been significant efforts to promote gender balance in the academic environment of Computer Science (CS). However, there is still a gender gap at all levels of CS academia, from students to PhD candidates and faculty members. The Department of Computer Science at UiT The Arctic University of Norway follows this trend. To address this issue within their department, the authors organized structured discussions with students to identify points of intervention that could increase gender balance among incoming CS students, current CS students, and those interested in entering CS academia. To ensure a high number of participants and a plurality of experiences, the authors hired two female student project assistants who were instrumental in reaching out to their fellow students and promoting the Better Balance in Informatics (BBI) agenda. They also redesigned the BBI website to include clear motivation for their mission and upcoming events. Various means were employed to advertise BBI discussion sessions including posting advertisements on department monitors and social networks, Canvas, UiT calendar, local student organization forums such as Discord server maintained by TD. Student assistants gave 5-minute talks about BBI during courses with high enrollment, created flyers and organized stands where students could casually socialize and talk about BBI. The discussions revealed ways to achieve a balanced flow of students into CS undergraduate programs, a balanced study environment for CS majors, and a balanced flow of graduates into higher levels of CS academia such as PhD programs. After analyzing data collected from these discussions, recommendations were made to the administration of the department along with a roadmap that other institutions could follow when organizing similar events as part of their gender-balance action plan. To begin with, it is crucial to encourage more female participation at an early stage by providing mentorship opportunities or creating outreach programs targeted towards girls in middle school or high school who may be interested in pursuing CS. The authors also recommend creating a more inclusive and supportive study environment for CS majors by providing mentorship programs, organizing networking events, and promoting diversity in hiring practices. Finally, to increase the number of female graduates entering higher levels of CS academia such as PhD programs it is recommended to provide more opportunities for research experience and funding as well as creating a supportive community that encourages women to pursue academic careers in CS.
Created on 14 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.