Open-Set Likelihood Maximization for Few-Shot Learning
AI-generated Key Points
- Few-Shot Open-Set Recognition (FSOSR) problem addressed
- Approach called Open-Set Likelihood Optimization (OSLO) introduced
- OSLO extends Maximum Likelihood framework in transductive setting
- Co-optimization of latent scores and parametric models through block-coordinate descent approach
- Interpretability and modularity of OSLO highlighted
- Superior performance of OSLO demonstrated in experiments across five datasets
- Comparison with five state-of-the-art approaches conducted to evaluate effectiveness
- Contributions include introducing OSLO, demonstrating its effectiveness, and evaluating transductive methods for FSOSR
Authors: Malik Boudiaf, Etienne Bennequin, Myriam Tami, Antoine Toubhans, Pablo Piantanida, Céline Hudelot, Ismail Ben Ayed
Abstract: We tackle the Few-Shot Open-Set Recognition (FSOSR) problem, i.e. classifying instances among a set of classes for which we only have a few labeled samples, while simultaneously detecting instances that do not belong to any known class. We explore the popular transductive setting, which leverages the unlabelled query instances at inference. Motivated by the observation that existing transductive methods perform poorly in open-set scenarios, we propose a generalization of the maximum likelihood principle, in which latent scores down-weighing the influence of potential outliers are introduced alongside the usual parametric model. Our formulation embeds supervision constraints from the support set and additional penalties discouraging overconfident predictions on the query set. We proceed with a block-coordinate descent, with the latent scores and parametric model co-optimized alternately, thereby benefiting from each other. We call our resulting formulation \textit{Open-Set Likelihood Optimization} (OSLO). OSLO is interpretable and fully modular; it can be applied on top of any pre-trained model seamlessly. Through extensive experiments, we show that our method surpasses existing inductive and transductive methods on both aspects of open-set recognition, namely inlier classification and outlier detection.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.