Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.08497v1

In recent years, the use of fast and automatic methods to classify variable stars for large amounts of data has become increasingly important. Traditional algorithms like Random Forest have been used in the past to classify variable stars, but neural networks as classifiers have gained attention due to their lower computational cost. In a recent study published in the Iranian Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mahdi Abdollahi et al. present a hierarchical model for classification of variable stars using deep convolutional neural networks. The Hierarchical Classification technique used in this study contains two main steps: predicting class and then subclass of stars. All models in both steps have the same network structure, and both Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) are tested. The pre-processing method uses light curves and period of stars as input data. The authors consider most classes and subclasses of variable stars in OGLE-IV database and show that using Hierarchical Classification technique with appropriate preprocessing can increase accuracy of predicting smaller classes such as ACep and T2Cep. The authors obtain an accuracy rate of 98% for class classification and 93% for subclasses classification. They also note that using folded light curves has the disadvantage of losing period information which is a critical feature for classification of variable stars. To solve this problem, the value of the period is provided as a separate feature to the model. In addition to discussing their methodology, Abdollahi et al. compare the accuracy and runtime of each type of neural network used to classify variable stars. They also explain how they use several classifiers to achieve better accuracy through hierarchical classification. While this study was done using OGLE-IV dataset, future work could include including other datasets like WISE and Gaia. The authors note that although their pre-processing method is challenging due to its high cost because of processing needed for calculating the period, it has a significant advantage over other methods based on features extracted from light curves. Overall, this study highlights the importance of using efficient and accurate methods for classifying variable stars in large datasets which can help improve astronomical research efforts worldwide by providing more reliable results faster than traditional methods can offer.

• - Fast and automatic methods are increasingly important for classifying variable stars in large datasets
• - Traditional algorithms like Random Forest have been used, but neural networks have gained attention due to lower computational cost
• - Mahdi Abdollahi et al. present a hierarchical model for classification of variable stars using deep convolutional neural networks
• - The Hierarchical Classification technique contains two main steps: predicting class and then subclass of stars
• - Both Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) are tested in the study
• - Pre-processing method uses light curves and period of stars as input data
• - Authors consider most classes and subclasses of variable stars in OGLE-IV database and show that using Hierarchical Classification technique with appropriate preprocessing can increase accuracy of predicting smaller classes such as ACep and T2Cep
• - Accuracy rate obtained is 98% for class classification and 93% for subclasses classification
• - Using folded light curves has the disadvantage of losing period information which is a critical feature for classification, so the value of the period is provided as a separate feature to the model
• - Authors compare accuracy and runtime of each type of neural network used to classify variable stars, and use several classifiers to achieve better accuracy through hierarchical classification.
• - Future work could include including other datasets like WISE and Gaia.
• - Pre-processing method is challenging due to its high cost because of processing needed for calculating the period, but it has a significant advantage over other methods based on features extracted from light curves.

Scientists are using computers to help them sort through a lot of information about stars that change in brightness. They use something called neural networks, which are like brains for computers. These networks can help them figure out what kind of star they're looking at. The scientists made a special way to use the neural network called Hierarchical Classification, which helps them be even more accurate. They tested different types of neural networks and found one that worked really well. In the future, they want to try this on other sets of data too. Definitions- Variable stars: stars that change in brightness over time - Algorithms: a set of instructions for a computer to follow - Neural networks: computer systems modeled after the human brain that can learn and make predictions based on patterns in data - Pre-processing: preparing data before it is analyzed by removing noise or irrelevant information - Accuracy rate: how often the computer correctly identifies what type of star it's looking at

Classifying Variable Stars with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Hierarchical Model

In recent years, the use of fast and automatic methods to classify variable stars for large amounts of data has become increasingly important. Traditional algorithms like Random Forest have been used in the past to classify variable stars, but neural networks as classifiers have gained attention due to their lower computational cost. In a recent study published in the Iranian Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mahdi Abdollahi et al. present a hierarchical model for classification of variable stars using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

Methodology

The Hierarchical Classification technique used in this study contains two main steps: predicting class and then subclass of stars. All models in both steps have the same network structure, and both Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) are tested. The pre-processing method uses light curves and period of stars as input data. The authors consider most classes and subclasses of variable stars in OGLE-IV database and show that using Hierarchical Classification technique with appropriate preprocessing can increase accuracy of predicting smaller classes such as ACep and T2Cep. The authors obtain an accuracy rate of 98% for class classification and 93% for subclasses classification. They also note that using folded light curves has the disadvantage of losing period information which is a critical feature for classification of variable stars. To solve this problem, the value of the period is provided as a separate feature to the model.

Comparison between CNNs & RNNs

In addition to discussing their methodology, Abdollahi et al compare the accuracy and runtime of each type of neural network used to classify variable stars. They find that CNNs outperform RNNs when it comes to accuracy while RNNs are faster than CNNs when it comes to runtime speed; however they note that there is still room for improvement on both fronts since neither approach reaches 100% accuracy or 0 runtime speed yet. They also explain how they use several classifiers to achieve better accuracy through hierarchical classification by combining different types/levels/layers into one unified system which can help improve astronomical research efforts worldwide by providing more reliable results faster than traditional methods can offer without sacrificing too much precision or recall rates either way depending on what kind(s)of classifier(s) you choose at any given time during your analysis process..

Future Work

While this study was done using OGLE-IV dataset, future work could include including other datasets like WISE and Gaia which would provide more accurate results due to larger sample sizes available from those sources compared with OGLE-IV alone.. Additionally exploring ways around pre-processing challenges such as high cost due to processing needed for calculating periods might be beneficial since this step seems especially difficult right now accordingto current findings mentioned earlier hereinabove.. Overall, this study highlights the importance of using efficient and accurate methods for classifying variable stars in large datasets which can help improve astronomical research efforts worldwide by providing more reliable results faster than traditional methods can offer if implemented correctly under proper conditions..