CEERS Spectroscopic Confirmation of NIRCam-Selected z > 8 Galaxy Candidates with JWST/NIRSpec: Initial Characterization of their Properties
AI-generated Key Points
- Spectroscopic confirmation of 11 galaxy candidates with photometric redshifts of $z\simeq9-13$ and $M_{\rm\,UV} \in[-21,-18]"
- Spectroscopic observations carried out using JWST NIRSpec instrument
- Emission line redshifts successfully confirmed for 7 galaxies in the range of $z=7.762-8.998$
- High confirmation rate of $\simeq$90% for photometric candidates at $z\simeq9$
- No robust emission lines identified in three galaxy candidates at $z>10"
- Comparisons made between NIRCam-selected galaxies and HST-selected bright galaxies ($M_{\rm\,UV}\simeq-22$)
- NIRCam-selected galaxies exhibit lower star formation rates (SFRs) and stellar masses compared to HST-selected galaxies
- NIRCam-selected galaxies have higher [OIII]+H$\beta$ equivalent widths and elevated production efficiency of ionizing photons induced by young stellar populations
- Empirical calibrations based on [OIII]/H$\beta$ ratio used to investigate metallicity and interstellar medium (ISM) conditions
- Higher SFRs and lower metallicities found in high-redshift galaxies compared to lower redshift galaxies
- Observations carried out as part of CEERS program in CANDELS Extended Groth Strip (EGS) field using JWST/NIRCam and JWST/NIRSpec instruments
Authors: Seiji Fujimoto, Pablo Arrabal Haro, Mark Dickinson, Steven L. Finkelstein, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Rebecca L. Larson, Denis Burgarella, Micaela B. Bagley, Peter Behroozi, Katherine Chworowsky, Michaela Hirschmann, Jonathan R. Trump, Stephen M. Wilkins, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Anton M. Koekemoer, Casey Papovich, Nor Pirzkal, Henry C. Ferguson, Adriano Fontana, Norman A. Grogin, Andrea Grazian, Lisa J. Kewley, Dale D. Kocevski, Jennifer M. Lotz, Laura Pentericci, Swara Ravindranath, Rachel S. Somerville, Ricardo O. Amorin, Bren E. Backhaus, Antonello Calabro, Caitlin M. Casey, M. C. Cooper, Maximilien Franco, Mauro Giavalisco, Nimish P. Hathi, Santosh Harish, Taylor A. Hutchison, Kartheik G. Iyer, Intae Jung, Ray A. Lucas, Jorge A. Zavala
Abstract: We present JWST NIRSpec spectroscopy for 11 galaxy candidates with photometric redshifts of $z\simeq9-13$ and $M_{\rm\,UV} \in[-21,-18]$ newly identified in NIRCam images in the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) Survey. We confirm emission line redshifts for 7 galaxies at $z=7.762-8.998$ using spectra at $\sim1-5\mu$m either with the NIRSpec prism or its three medium resolution gratings. For $z\simeq9$ photometric candidates, we achieve a high confirmation rate of $\simeq$90\%, which validates the classical dropout selection from NIRCam photometry. No robust emission lines are identified in three galaxy candidates at $z>10$, where the strong [OIII] and H$\beta$ lines would be redshifted beyond the wavelength range observed by NIRSpec, and the Lyman-$\alpha$ continuum break is not detected with the current sensitivity. Compared with HST-selected bright galaxies ($M_{\rm\,UV}\simeq-22$) that are similarly spectroscopically confirmed at $z\gtrsim8$, these NIRCam-selected galaxies are characterized by lower star formation rates (SFR$\simeq4\,M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$) and lower stellar masses ($\simeq10^{8}\,M_{\odot}$), but with higher [OIII]+H$\beta$ equivalent widths ($\simeq$1100$\r{A}$), and elevated production efficiency of ionizing photons ($\log(\xi_{\rm\,ion}/{\rm\,Hz\,erg}^{-1})\simeq25.8$) induced by young stellar populations ($<10$~Myrs) accounting for $\simeq20\%$ of the galaxy mass, highlighting the key contribution of faint galaxies to cosmic reionization. Taking advantage of the homogeneous selection and sensitivity, we also investigate metallicity and ISM conditions with empirical calibrations using the [OIII]/H$\beta$ ratio. We find that galaxies at $z\sim8-9$ have higher SFRs and lower metallicities than galaxies at similar stellar masses at $z\sim2-6$, which is generally consistent with the current galaxy formation and evolution models.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.