DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptation

AI-generated keywords: Fully Test-time Adaptation Degradation-free Test-time Batch Renormalization (TBR) Dynamic Online re-weighTing (DOT) Performance Degradation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper proposes a solution to adapt pre-trained models to test streams during real-time inference when the test distribution differs from the training distribution.
  • Prevalent adaptation methodologies like test-time batch normalization (BN) and self-learning have two unfavorable defects: inaccurate estimates resulting from normalization statistics in test-time BN being completely affected by the currently received test samples, and biased parameter updates towards some dominant classes during test-time adaptation.
  • Previous approaches work well in certain scenarios while showing performance degradation in others due to their faults.
  • The proposed solution called DELTA for Degradation-freE fuLly Test-time Adaptation consists of two components: Test-time Batch Renormalization (TBR), introduced to improve the estimated normalization statistics; and Dynamic Online re-weighTing (DOT), designed to address class bias within optimization.
  • The study investigates various test-time adaptation methods on three commonly used datasets with four scenarios and a newly introduced real-world dataset. DELTA can help deal with all scenarios simultaneously, leading to state-of-the art (SOTA) performance.
  • Defects can be exacerbated in more complicated test environments such as time dependent or class imbalanced data, highlighting the importance of developing robust solutions for fully test time adaptation.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Bowen Zhao, Chen Chen, Shu-Tao Xia

Abstract: Fully test-time adaptation aims at adapting a pre-trained model to the test stream during real-time inference, which is urgently required when the test distribution differs from the training distribution. Several efforts have been devoted to improving adaptation performance. However, we find that two unfavorable defects are concealed in the prevalent adaptation methodologies like test-time batch normalization (BN) and self-learning. First, we reveal that the normalization statistics in test-time BN are completely affected by the currently received test samples, resulting in inaccurate estimates. Second, we show that during test-time adaptation, the parameter update is biased towards some dominant classes. In addition to the extensively studied test stream with independent and class-balanced samples, we further observe that the defects can be exacerbated in more complicated test environments, such as (time) dependent or class-imbalanced data. We observe that previous approaches work well in certain scenarios while show performance degradation in others due to their faults. In this paper, we provide a plug-in solution called DELTA for Degradation-freE fuLly Test-time Adaptation, which consists of two components: (i) Test-time Batch Renormalization (TBR), introduced to improve the estimated normalization statistics. (ii) Dynamic Online re-weighTing (DOT), designed to address the class bias within optimization. We investigate various test-time adaptation methods on three commonly used datasets with four scenarios, and a newly introduced real-world dataset. DELTA can help them deal with all scenarios simultaneously, leading to SOTA performance.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Jan. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2301.13018v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptation" proposes a solution to the problem of adapting a pre-trained model to the test stream during real-time inference, which is urgently required when the test distribution differs from the training distribution. While several efforts have been devoted to improving adaptation performance, the authors find that two unfavorable defects are concealed in prevalent adaptation methodologies like test-time batch normalization (BN) and self-learning. The first defect is related to inaccurate estimates resulting from normalization statistics in test-time BN being completely affected by the currently received test samples. The second defect pertains to biased parameter updates towards some dominant classes during test-time adaptation. The authors observe that previous approaches work well in certain scenarios while showing performance degradation in others due to their faults. In this paper, they provide a plug-in solution called DELTA for Degradation-freE fuLly Test-time Adaptation, which consists of two components: Test-time Batch Renormalization (TBR), introduced to improve the estimated normalization statistics; and Dynamic Online re-weighTing (DOT), designed to address class bias within optimization. The study investigates various test-time adaptation methods on three commonly used datasets with four scenarios and a newly introduced real-world dataset. DELTA can help deal with all scenarios simultaneously, leading to state-of-the art (SOTA) performance. The authors further note that defects can be exacerbated in more complicated test environments such as time dependent or class imbalanced data, highlighting the importance of developing robust solutions for fully test time adaptation. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into improving adaptation performance and presents an effective solution for addressing existing faults in prevalent methodologies.
Created on 17 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.