Overcoming Simplicity Bias in Deep Networks using a Feature Sieve
AI-generated Key Points
- Deep neural networks (DNNs) have a simplicity bias, relying on weakly predictive features over stronger, more complex ones.
- Limited training data and spurious feature-label correlations compound this issue, leading to biased and incorrect predictions.
- The authors propose a direct interventional method called the feature sieve (SIFER) to address this problem in DNNs.
- SIFER identifies and suppresses easily computable spurious features in lower layers of the network, allowing higher levels to extract richer and more meaningful representations.
- SIFER outperforms many baselines that explicitly incorporate prior knowledge of spurious attributes or features.
- Using feature importance visualizations, the authors demonstrate that SIFER correctly identifies important visual features while suppressing irrelevant but spuriously label-correlated background features.
- SIFER encourages further research into designing computational barriers for neural networks by automating the extraction and combination of diverse features ordered by complexity and predictive power towards debiasing machine learning models.
Authors: Rishabh Tiwari, Pradeep Shenoy
Abstract: Simplicity bias is the concerning tendency of deep networks to over-depend on simple, weakly predictive features, to the exclusion of stronger, more complex features. This is exacerbated in real-world applications by limited training data and spurious feature-label correlations, leading to biased, incorrect predictions. We propose a direct, interventional method for addressing simplicity bias in DNNs, which we call the feature sieve. We aim to automatically identify and suppress easily-computable spurious features in lower layers of the network, thereby allowing the higher network levels to extract and utilize richer, more meaningful representations. We provide concrete evidence of this differential suppression & enhancement of relevant features on both controlled datasets and real-world images, and report substantial gains on many real-world debiasing benchmarks (11.4% relative gain on Imagenet-A; 3.2% on BAR, etc). Crucially, we do not depend on prior knowledge of spurious attributes or features, and in fact outperform many baselines that explicitly incorporate such information. We believe that our feature sieve work opens up exciting new research directions in automated adversarial feature extraction and representation learning for deep networks.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.