EDEN Survey: Small Transiting Planet Detection Limits and Constraints on the Occurrence Rates for Late M Dwarfs within 15 pc
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The search for Earth-sized exoplanets that transit nearby late spectral type red dwarfs is a top priority for atmospheric characterization in the coming decade.
- Wide-field transit surveys like Kepler or TESS face challenges in finding these systems, resulting in unexplored transiting planets and poorly constrained occurrence rates of short-period Earth-sized planets around late M dwarfs.
- The EDEN survey conducted the deepest photometric monitoring campaign of 22 nearby late M dwarf stars using data from over 500 nights on seven 1-2 meter class telescopes.
- The survey successfully identified most (>80%) transiting short-period (0.5-1 d) super-Earths (R > 1.9 R_⊕) and was sensitive (~50%) to transiting Earth-sized planets (1.0-1.2 R_⊕) with a near zero false positive rate, demonstrating an efficient survey strategy.
- No transiting planet detections were made, but the survey provided highly sensitive upper limits on their occurrence rates.
- Multiple hypotheses about the occurrence rates of short period planets around late M dwarfs were explored using the dataset obtained by EDEN, including showing that giant planets at short periods (<1 day) are uncommon around target stars.
- The dataset provides some insight into occurrence rates of short period planets around TRAPPIST-1 like stars and can help test planetary formation and system evolution models while guiding future observations of nearby late M dwarfs.
Authors: Jeremy Dietrich, Dániel Apai, Martin Schlecker, Kevin K. Hardegree-Ullman, Benjamin V. Rackham, Nicolas Kurtovic, Karan Molaverdikhani, Paul Gabor, Thomas Henning, Wen-Ping Chen, Luigi Mancini, Alex Bixel, Aidan Gibbs, Richard P. Boyle, Samantha Brown-Sevilla, Remo Burn, Timmy N. Delage, Lizxandra Flores-Rivera, Riccardo Franceschi, Gabriele Pichierri, Sofia Savvidou, Jonas Syed, Ivan Bruni, Wing-Huen Ip, Chow-Choong Ngeow, An-Li Tsai, Chia-Lung Lin, Wei-Jie Hou, Hsiang-Yao Hsiao, Chi-Sheng Lin, Hung-Chin Lin, Ritvik Basant
Abstract: Earth-sized exoplanets that transit nearby, late spectral type red dwarfs will be prime targets for atmospheric characterization in the coming decade. Such systems, however, are difficult to find via wide-field transit surveys like Kepler or TESS. Consequently, the presence of such transiting planets is unexplored and the occurrence rates of short-period Earth-sized planets around late M dwarfs remain poorly constrained. Here, we present the deepest photometric monitoring campaign of 22 nearby late M dwarf stars, using data from over 500 nights on seven 1-2 meter class telescopes. Our survey includes all known single quiescent northern late M dwarfs within 15 pc. We use transit-injection-and-recovery tests to quantify the completeness of our survey, successfully identify most ($>80\%$) transiting short-period (0.5-1 d) super-Earths ($R > 1.9 R_\oplus$), and are sensitive ($\sim50\%$) to transiting Earth-sized planets ($1.0-1.2 R_\oplus$). Our high sensitivity to transits with a near-zero false positive rate demonstrates an efficient survey strategy. Our survey does not yield a transiting planet detection, yet it provides the most sensitive upper limits on transiting planets orbiting our target stars. Finally, we explore multiple hypotheses about the occurrence rates of short-period planets (from Earth-sized planets to giant planets) around late M dwarfs. We show, for example, that giant planets at short periods ($<1$ day) are uncommon around our target stars. Our dataset provides some insight into occurrence rates of short-period planets around TRAPPIST-1-like stars, and our results can help test planetary formation and system evolution models, as well as guide future observations of nearby late M dwarfs.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.