Feature-based SpMV Performance Analysis on Contemporary Devices
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- SpMV kernel is a critical component in high-performance computing
- Performance variation depends on input matrix and computing platform
- GPUs were previously state-of-the-art for SpMV, but recent advancements in multicore CPUs and low-power FPGA accelerators have prompted a reevaluation of their performance and energy efficiency
- Authors present a high-level SpMV performance analysis based on structural features of matrices related to common bottlenecks such as memory-bandwidth intensity, low ILP, load imbalance, and memory latency overheads
- Analysis conducted using an extensive artificial matrix dataset across nine modern HPC platforms: five CPUs, three GPUs, and an FPGA
- Multicore CPUs can outperform GPUs for certain types of matrices with more balanced characteristics
- Low-power FPGAs show promise as an energy-efficient alternative to both GPUs and CPUs for certain types of matrices with specific structural features
- Paper provides valuable insights into how different structural features impact SpMV performance across various computing platforms which can inform future developments in hardware design and optimization strategies for SpMV kernels in high-performance computing applications.
Authors: Panagiotis Mpakos, Dimitrios Galanopoulos, Petros Anastasiadis, Nikela Papadopoulou, Nectarios Koziris, Georgios Goumas
Abstract: The SpMV kernel is characterized by high performance variation per input matrix and computing platform. While GPUs were considered State-of-the-Art for SpMV, with the emergence of advanced multicore CPUs and low-power FPGA accelerators, we need to revisit its performance and energy efficiency. This paper provides a high-level SpMV performance analysis based on structural features of matrices related to common bottlenecks of memory-bandwidth intensity, low ILP, load imbalance and memory latency overheads. Towards this, we create a wide artificial matrix dataset that spans these features and study the performance of different storage formats in nine modern HPC platforms; five CPUs, three GPUs and an FPGA. After validating our proposed methodology using real-world matrices, we analyze our extensive experimental results and draw key insights on the competitiveness of different target architectures for SpMV and the impact of each feature/bottleneck on its performance.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 1
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.