Cyber-risk Perception and Prioritization for Decision-Making and Threat Intelligence

Authors: Mario Angelelli, Serena Arima, Christian Catalano, Enrico Ciavolino

35 pages, 24 figures. Comments are welcome!
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.08348v2

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The summary is not ready yet

Abstract: Cyber-risk assessment is gaining momentum due to the wide range of research and innovation sectors that can benefit from the prevention of cyber-incidents. The increasing connectivity of digital and (cyber-)physical systems requires more attention to cyber-security to enhance the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of data. We introduce a general framework supporting the prioritization of cyber-vulnerabilities, using flexible regression models that enhance the interpretability of the analysis for decision-making. We take advantage of Mid-Quantile regression as a robust method to deal with ordinal severity assessment, and we compare it to the state-of-the-art models for cyber-risk ranking and graded responses, identifying a novel accuracy measure suited for the decision-maker's prioritization. Our model is grounded on real data from selected databases that support the exploitation of cyber-vulnerabilities in real contexts. The variety of information arising from such datasets allows us to compare multiple models based on their predictive performance, showing how accessible information can influence perception and, hence, decision-making in operational scenarios. Applications for threat intelligence functionalities are discussed too.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Feb. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.