Efficient removal of nanoplastics from synthetic wastewater using electrocoagulation
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Nanoplastics are a global environmental concern due to their potential harm to human health and the environment.
- Bisphenol and perfluoro alkylates adsorbing on micro and nanoplastics can enter the food chain through various routes, including wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs).
- Researchers investigated the removal of nanoplastics from synthetic wastewater using an electrocoagulation process.
- Aluminum electrodes were used in parallel combination at low voltage conditions for electrocoagulation (EC), with polystyrene nanoparticles as nanoplastics synthesized from expanded polystyrene waste (EPS).
- Various process parameters such as electrode spacing, salt concentration, and applied voltage's influence on removing nanoplastics were studied.
- Maximum removal efficiency of over 95% could be achieved at a specific electrolyte concentration and pH of 7.2 +/- 0.3.
- Gas bubbles released during EC enabled removal from the top by scraping them off.
- Electrocoagulation can efficiently remove nanoplastic pollutants from synthetic wastewater while providing valuable insights into optimizing process parameters for effective removal.
- This research could pave the way for developing more effective and sustainable methods to mitigate the growing threat of nanoplastics in our environment.
Authors: Vishal Singh Pawak, Vijay A. Loganathan, Manigandan Sabapathy
Abstract: Nanoplastics are emerging contaminants that have now transformed into a worldwide environmental concern. It is a lesser-known fact that several emerging contaminants, such as bisphenol and perfluoro alkylates adsorbing on micro and nanoplastics, could invade the food chain and cause irreversible damage to human health and the environment. Even though wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been around for a long time, their removal strategy needs to be improved since this is one of the main routes that micro and nanoplastics get into the environment. UV deterioration, mechanical stresses, and biological processes cause plastics to break apart and turn into smaller pieces. They get small enough to be called nanoplastics, i.e. 1 um. We studied the removal of nanoplastics from synthetic wastewater using an electrocoagulation process. We used the polystyrene nanoparticles as nanoplastics synthesized from the expanded polystyrene waste (EPS). For studies on electrocoagulation (EC), aluminium electrodes were used in parallel combination at low voltage conditions. We take advantage of the release of gas bubbles from the process to enable the removal from the top by scraping them off. We studied the influence of various process parameters on removing nanoplastics, such as electrode spacing, salt concentration, and applied voltage. We found that a maximum removal efficiency of more than 95% could be achieved at a specific electrolyte concentration and pH of 7.2 +/- 0.3, illustrating that EC is a successful technique for removing nanoplastic pollutants from the aquatic environment. The advantage of the proposed method is that when nanoplastics and coagulants are mixed, they help make a foamy layer on top of the reactor that can be easily scraped off. The results of this study could serve as baseline information for achieving massive nanoplastics cleanup on a larger scale in an eco-friendly way.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.