A lensed radio jet at milli-arcsecond resolution II: Constraints on fuzzy dark matter from an extended gravitational arc
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Researchers used very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) to observe a gravitational lens system at an impressive resolution of less than 5 milli-arcseconds.
- The aim of the study was to investigate the properties of fuzzy dark matter (FDM) particles.
- FDM particles with masses below $4.4\times10^{-21}~\mathrm{eV}$ are ruled out with a high confidence level.
- The research extends its findings to non-scalar and multiple-field models such as vector FDM, excluding FDM particles with masses greater than $1.4 \times 10^{-21}~\mathrm{eV}$ based on their analysis.
- The observation takes into account the extended source structure and high angular resolution, allowing for direct sensitivity to granule structures in the main dark matter halo of the lens system.
- Comparing with previous analyses, this study's lower bounds on FDM particle mass are competitive and provide valuable insights into dark matter physics.
- Future observations conducted at higher resolutions have the potential to further improve constraints on FDM particle masses by up to two orders of magnitude.
Authors: Devon M. Powell, Simona Vegetti, J. P. McKean, Simon D. M. White, Elisa G. M. Ferreira, Simon May, Cristiana Spingola
Abstract: Using a single gravitational lens system observed at $\lesssim5$ milli-arcsecond resolution with very long baseline interferometry (VLBI), we place a lower bound on the mass of the fuzzy dark matter (FDM) particle, ruling out $m_\chi \leq 4.4\times10^{-21}~\mathrm{eV}$ with a 20:1 posterior odds ratio relative to a smooth lens model. We generalize our result to non-scalar and multiple-field models, such as vector FDM, with $m_{\chi,\mathrm{vec}} > 1.4 \times 10^{-21}~\mathrm{eV}$. Due to the extended source structure and high angular resolution of the observation, our analysis is directly sensitive to the presence of granule structures in the main dark matter halo of the lens, which is the most generic prediction of FDM theories. A model based on well-understood physics of ultra-light dark matter fields in a gravitational potential well makes our result robust to a wide range of assumed dark matter fractions and velocity dispersions in the lens galaxy. Our result is competitive with other lower bounds on $m_\chi$ from past analyses, which rely on intermediate modelling of structure formation and/or baryonic effects. Higher resolution observations taken at 10 to 100 GHz could improve our constraints by up to 2 orders of magnitude in the future.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.