Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.12173v1

We are witnessing significant advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), which are being integrated into various systems such as integrated development environments (IDEs) and search engines. These LLMs can be controlled through natural language prompts, but their internal functionality remains implicit and unassessable. While this adaptability makes them suitable for unseen tasks, it also exposes them to targeted adversarial prompting. Prompt Injection (PI) attacks have recently been introduced as a way to misalign LLMs. In these attacks, an adversary can manipulate the LLM to produce malicious content or override the original instructions and filtering schemes. However, these attacks have assumed that the adversary directly prompts the LLM. This work introduces a new set of attack vectors by augmenting LLMs with retrieval and API calling capabilities, known as Application-Integrated LLMs. These LLMs can process poisoned content retrieved from the web, which contains pre-injected malicious prompts selected by adversaries. The authors demonstrate that attackers can indirectly perform PI attacks using these Application-Integrated LLMs. Based on this insight, the authors systematically analyze the resulting threat landscape of Application-Integrated LLMs and discuss various new attack vectors to validate their practical viability. To further evaluate their findings, they implement specific demonstrations within synthetic applications. In summary, this work highlights the urgent need for evaluating current mitigation techniques and investigating whether new techniques are required to defend against these threats to LLMs.

• - Significant advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) are being integrated into various systems such as IDEs and search engines.
• - LLMs can be controlled through natural language prompts, but their internal functionality remains implicit and unassessable.
• - Prompt Injection (PI) attacks have been introduced as a way to misalign LLMs, allowing adversaries to manipulate them and produce malicious content.
• - Application-Integrated LLMs augment LLMs with retrieval and API calling capabilities, enabling them to process poisoned content retrieved from the web.
• - Attackers can indirectly perform PI attacks using Application-Integrated LLMs by injecting pre-selected malicious prompts into the retrieved content.
• - The authors systematically analyze the threat landscape of Application-Integrated LLMs and discuss new attack vectors to validate their practical viability.
• - Synthetic applications are used to demonstrate specific scenarios within this research.
• - There is an urgent need for evaluating current mitigation techniques and investigating whether new techniques are required to defend against these threats.

Key points1. Big improvements are being made to language models that help with things like writing and searching. 2. These models can understand and respond to what people say, but we don't know exactly how they work on the inside. 3. Some people have figured out ways to trick these models into saying bad things or giving wrong information. 4. The models can also be made to use information from the internet, which can include bad stuff. 5. Bad people can use these models to make bad things happen. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that help with writing and searching. - IDEs: Programs that help with writing computer code. - Search engines: Tools used to find information on the internet. - Prompt Injection (PI) attacks: Tricks used by bad people to manipulate language models and make them say or do bad things. - Adversaries: Bad people who want to cause harm or do something wrong. - Retrieval: Getting information from a source, like the internet. - API calling capabilities: The ability of a program to request and use data from other programs or websites. - Poisoned content: Information that has been intentionally made harmful or dangerous. - Attack vectors: Different ways that attackers can try to harm or manipulate something. - Synthetic applications: Fake programs created for testing purposes.

Large Language Models: A New Frontier for Adversarial Prompt Injection Attacks

The world of artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing, and with it comes the potential for malicious actors to exploit these technologies. Large Language Models (LLMs) are being integrated into various systems such as integrated development environments (IDEs) and search engines, allowing them to be controlled through natural language prompts. While this adaptability makes them suitable for unseen tasks, it also exposes them to targeted adversarial prompting. This article will discuss a new type of attack vector known as Prompt Injection (PI) attacks that can be used to misalign LLMs, as well as the implications of augmenting LLMs with retrieval and API calling capabilities in terms of security.

What are Prompt Injection Attacks?

Prompt Injection (PI) attacks have recently been introduced as a way to manipulate an LLM’s output by injecting malicious content or overriding the original instructions and filtering schemes. These attacks assume that the adversary directly prompts the LLM; however, this work introduces a new set of attack vectors by augmenting LLMs with retrieval and API calling capabilities—known as Application-Integrated LLMs—which can process poisoned content retrieved from the web containing pre-injected malicious prompts selected by adversaries.

Implications of Application-Integrated LLMs

The authors systematically analyze the resulting threat landscape posed by Application-Integrated LLMs and discuss various new attack vectors which demonstrate their practical viability. To further evaluate their findings, they implement specific demonstrations within synthetic applications. These findings highlight the urgent need for evaluating current mitigation techniques against PI attacks on Application-Integrated LLMs, as well as investigating whether new techniques are required to defend against these threats.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this research paper has demonstrated how attackers can indirectly perform PI attacks using Application-Integrated Large Language Models, thereby introducing a whole new set of attack vectors that must be taken into consideration when assessing an AI system’s security posture. The authors have provided insight into how existing mitigation techniques may not be sufficient in defending against these types of threats, making it essential for researchers to investigate whether additional measures should be implemented in order to protect AI systems from malicious actors who may attempt to use PI attacks against them.