Full Stack Optimization of Transformer Inference: a Survey
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Recent advancements in deep neural network (DNN) architecture design have focused on Transformer models
- Transformer models have shown superior accuracy across various applications
- Growing computational and bandwidth requirements of recent Transformer models pose challenges for deployment in latency-sensitive applications
- Researchers are exploring methods to make Transformer models more efficient, including architectural changes and specialized accelerators
- The authors provide a comprehensive survey of different approaches for efficient Transformer inference
- Analysis and profiling of bottlenecks in existing Transformer architectures compared to previous convolutional models
- Examination of the implications of the Transformer architecture on hardware design, considering non-linear and linear operations
- Discussion of approaches for optimizing fixed Transformer architectures and challenges associated with mapping and scheduling operations
- Exploration of using neural architecture search to adapt the architecture of Transformer models for optimization purposes
- Case study using Gemmini - an open-source DNN accelerator generator - demonstrating significant speedup without substantial performance degradation during Transformer inference
- Insights into improving efficiency in Transformer inference by addressing architectural limitations and hardware considerations
- Contribution to advancing the field of efficient DNN model deployment and practical guidance for optimizing Transformer models in real-world applications.
Authors: Sehoon Kim, Coleman Hooper, Thanakul Wattanawong, Minwoo Kang, Ruohan Yan, Hasan Genc, Grace Dinh, Qijing Huang, Kurt Keutzer, Michael W. Mahoney, Yakun Sophia Shao, Amir Gholami
Abstract: Recent advances in state-of-the-art DNN architecture design have been moving toward Transformer models. These models achieve superior accuracy across a wide range of applications. This trend has been consistent over the past several years since Transformer models were originally introduced. However, the amount of compute and bandwidth required for inference of recent Transformer models is growing at a significant rate, and this has made their deployment in latency-sensitive applications challenging. As such, there has been an increased focus on making Transformer models more efficient, with methods that range from changing the architecture design, all the way to developing dedicated domain-specific accelerators. In this work, we survey different approaches for efficient Transformer inference, including: (i) analysis and profiling of the bottlenecks in existing Transformer architectures and their similarities and differences with previous convolutional models; (ii) implications of Transformer architecture on hardware, including the impact of non-linear operations such as Layer Normalization, Softmax, and GELU, as well as linear operations, on hardware design; (iii) approaches for optimizing a fixed Transformer architecture; (iv) challenges in finding the right mapping and scheduling of operations for Transformer models; and (v) approaches for optimizing Transformer models by adapting the architecture using neural architecture search. Finally, we perform a case study by applying the surveyed optimizations on Gemmini, the open-source, full-stack DNN accelerator generator, and we show how each of these approaches can yield improvements, compared to previous benchmark results on Gemmini. Among other things, we find that a full-stack co-design approach with the aforementioned methods can result in up to 88.7x speedup with a minimal performance degradation for Transformer inference.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.