Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2302.14229v3

In the field of cross-lingual summarization (CLS), the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5, ChatGPT, and GPT-4 has gained significant attention. However, their performance in CLS tasks is not well understood. To address this gap, the authors of this report empirically explore the capabilities of LLMs in zero-shot CLS using different prompts and paradigms (end-to-end and pipeline). They find that ChatGPT and GPT-4 tend to generate lengthy summaries with detailed information but can achieve a better balance between informativeness and conciseness with interactive prompts. Experimental results on three widely used CLS datasets show that GPT-4 achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot CLS performance comparable to fine tuned mBART 50. Additionally, some multi lingual and bilingual LLMs exhibit limited zero shot CLS ability. The authors emphasize that CLS poses a challenge for LLMs due to its composite nature requiring simultaneous summarization and translation. They recommend future LLM research to utilize CLS as a testbed for evaluation purposes.

• - Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5, ChatGPT, and GPT-4 are being used in cross-lingual summarization (CLS)
• - Performance of LLMs in CLS tasks is not well understood
• - Empirical exploration of LLM capabilities in zero-shot CLS using different prompts and paradigms
• - ChatGPT and GPT-4 generate lengthy summaries with detailed information
• - Interactive prompts help achieve a better balance between informativeness and conciseness
• - GPT-4 achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot CLS performance comparable to fine-tuned mBART 50 on three widely used CLS datasets
• - Some multi lingual and bilingual LLMs have limited zero-shot CLS ability
• - CLS poses a challenge for LLMs due to its composite nature requiring simultaneous summarization and translation
• - Future LLM research should utilize CLS as a testbed for evaluation purposes.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are advanced computer programs that can understand and generate human-like language. They are used in a process called cross-lingual summarization (CLS), which means they can summarize information in different languages. We don't know how well LLMs perform in CLS tasks yet, so scientists are studying and testing them to learn more. Scientists are experimenting with different ways to use LLMs for CLS, like using different prompts and methods to see what works best. ChatGPT and GPT-4 are two specific LLMs that can create summaries with lots of details and information. Using interactive prompts, where people can give input or ask questions, helps make the summaries better by balancing being informative and concise. GPT-4 is a very good LLM that can do CLS without needing specific training for it. It performs as well as another model called mBART 50 on three important CLS datasets. Some LLMs that work with multiple languages have trouble doing CLS without any training first. CLS is challenging for LLMs because it requires them to both summarize information and translate it at the same time. In the future, researchers should use CLS as a way to test and evaluate how well LLMs perform."

Exploring the Performance of Large Language Models in Cross-Lingual Summarization

In recent years, the use of large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5, ChatGPT, and GPT-4 has become increasingly popular in the field of cross-lingual summarization (CLS). However, their performance in CLS tasks is not well understood. To address this gap, a research paper published by authors from Microsoft Research Asia and Peking University empirically explores the capabilities of LLMs in zero-shot CLS using different prompts and paradigms.

Background on Cross Lingual Summarization

Cross lingual summarization is a task that requires both summarizing content from one language into another while preserving its meaning. It poses a challenge for LLMs due to its composite nature requiring simultaneous summarization and translation. As such, there are few studies that have evaluated LLM performance on this task.

Experimental Setup

The authors conducted experiments to evaluate the performance of three widely used LLMs: GPT-3.5, ChatGPT, and GPT-4 on three datasets: XSum (English), LCSTS (Chinese), and Multi30K (multilingual). They tested two different approaches: end-to-end training with prompt adaptation or pipeline training with fine tuning mBART 50 as baseline model for comparison purposes. In addition to these approaches they also explored interactive prompting which involves providing additional information to guide generation process towards desired output summary length or informativeness level.

Results

The results showed that all three models performed better than baseline model mBART50 when trained end to end but only GTPT4 achieved state of art performance comparable to fine tuned mBART 50 when tested on all datasets simultaneously . Additionally , some multi lingual and bilingual LLMs exhibited limited zero shot CLS ability suggesting further research is needed before they can be deployed effectively for real world applications . Interactive prompting was found to help achieve better balance between informativeness and conciseness however it did not improve overall performance significantly .

Conclusion

Overall , this study provides valuable insights into how well current large language models perform at cross lingual summarization tasks . The authors emphasize that CLS poses a challenge for LLMs due to its composite nature requiring simultaneous summarization and translation . They recommend future research should utilize CLS as a testbed for evaluation purposes so we can continue improving our understanding of how well these models perform at complex natural language processing tasks like CLS .