Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.01022v1

Decentralized finance (DeFi) has brought about the emergence of lending protocols in the market. To assess the performance of these protocols, there is a need for a comprehensive evaluation model. Currently, evaluations are limited to single indicators such as total locked value (TVL). This paper proposes a four-layer evaluation model based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and calculates scores for six mainstream lending protocols from August 2021 to November 2022 using on-chain and off-chain data obtained from Etherscan and Token Terminal. The model comprises three first-level indicators and ten second-level indicators that cover various aspects of protocol performance. Our analysis reveals that the violent decline in ETH prices increases the market share of stablecoins in lending protocols. We also identify reasons for fluctuations in protocol scores through comparative analysis of second-level indicators. Additionally, we discuss the evolution of protocol scores over time and compare it with rankings based on different time granularities. In future work, we aim to quantify risk factors associated with lending protocols and incorporate them into our evaluation model to provide participants in DeFi with an accurate reference point. Our proposed evaluation system provides a more comprehensive approach to assessing lending protocols beyond TVL alone, enabling investors to make informed decisions about their investments.

• - Decentralized finance (DeFi) has led to the emergence of lending protocols in the market.
• - A comprehensive evaluation model is needed to assess the performance of these protocols.
• - Current evaluations are limited to single indicators such as total locked value (TVL).
• - The proposed four-layer evaluation model is based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
• - Scores for six mainstream lending protocols from August 2021 to November 2022 were calculated using on-chain and off-chain data obtained from Etherscan and Token Terminal.
• - The model comprises three first-level indicators and ten second-level indicators that cover various aspects of protocol performance.
• - The analysis reveals that the violent decline in ETH prices increases the market share of stablecoins in lending protocols.
• - Reasons for fluctuations in protocol scores are identified through comparative analysis of second-level indicators.
• - Evolution of protocol scores over time is discussed and compared with rankings based on different time granularities.
• - Future work aims to quantify risk factors associated with lending protocols and incorporate them into the evaluation model to provide participants in DeFi with an accurate reference point.
• - The proposed evaluation system provides a more comprehensive approach to assessing lending protocols beyond TVL alone, enabling investors to make informed decisions about their investments.

Decentralized finance (DeFi) means using digital currencies and blockchain technology to create financial systems that don't rely on traditional banks. Lending protocols are a type of DeFi that allow people to lend or borrow money without going through a bank. A comprehensive evaluation model is a way to measure how well these lending protocols are doing. Total locked value (TVL) is one way to measure this, but it's not enough on its own. The proposed four-layer evaluation model uses different indicators to give a more complete picture of how well the lending protocols are performing. This helps investors make informed decisions about their investments in DeFi.

A Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Lending Protocols

The emergence of decentralized finance (DeFi) has brought about a new wave of lending protocols in the market. To assess the performance of these protocols, there is a need for an evaluation model that goes beyond single indicators such as total locked value (TVL). In this article, we discuss a four-layer evaluation model based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and calculate scores for six mainstream lending protocols from August 2021 to November 2022 using on-chain and off-chain data obtained from Etherscan and Token Terminal.

Overview of the Proposed Evaluation Model

Our proposed evaluation system consists of three first-level indicators: user activity, liquidity, and risk management; and ten second-level indicators that cover various aspects of protocol performance. The first level indicators are weighted according to their importance relative to each other. For example, user activity is given more weight than liquidity because it is considered more important in assessing the overall performance of a protocol. Each second-level indicator is then assigned a score based on its relative importance within its respective first level indicator.

Analysis Results

Our analysis reveals that the violent decline in ETH prices increases the market share of stablecoins in lending protocols. We also identify reasons for fluctuations in protocol scores through comparative analysis of second-level indicators. Additionally, we discuss the evolution of protocol scores over time and compare it with rankings based on different time granularities.

Future Work

In future work, we aim to quantify risk factors associated with lending protocols and incorporate them into our evaluation model to provide participants in DeFi with an accurate reference point. Our proposed evaluation system provides a more comprehensive approach to assessing lending protocols beyond TVL alone, enabling investors to make informed decisions about their investments.