The Dark Side of Augmented Reality: Exploring Manipulative Designs in AR
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Augmented Reality (AR) applications are increasingly popular
- Malicious techniques can exploit the mixed nature of physical-virtual environments to deceive users
- Dark patterns are deceiving techniques designed to influence individuals' behavioural decisions
- Few studies have been conducted regarding dark patterns in AR environments
- Researchers used scenario construction and VR mockups to investigate the potential future approaches that dark patterns can have in AR environments
- Results indicated that dark patterns were effective in immersive scenarios, and novel techniques such as "haptic grabbing" could be used to influence participants' movements
- Mitigation strategies are needed, including education and awareness-raising campaigns for users and developers alike.
Authors: Xian Wang, Lik-Hang Lee, Carlos Bermejo Fernandez, Pan Hui
Abstract: Augmented Reality (AR) applications are becoming more mainstream, with successful examples in the mobile environment like Pokemon GO. Current malicious techniques can exploit these environments' immersive and mixed nature (physical-virtual) to trick users into providing more personal information, i.e., dark patterns. Dark patterns are deceiving techniques (e.g., interface tricks) designed to influence individuals' behavioural decisions. However, there are few studies regarding dark patterns' potential issues in AR environments. In this work, using scenario construction to build our prototypes, we investigate the potential future approaches that dark patterns can have. We use VR mockups in our user study to analyze the effects of dark patterns in AR. Our study indicates that dark patterns are effective in immersive scenarios, and the use of novel techniques such as `haptic grabbing' to drag participants' attention can influence their movements. Finally, we discuss the impact of such malicious techniques and what techniques can mitigate them.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.