This paper proposes a self-planning code generation method with large language models (LLMs) to address the difficulty of generating complex code from human intent. The proposed approach consists of two phases: planning and implementation. In the planning phase, the LLM plans out solution steps from the provided intent combined with in-context learning. Then, in the implementation phase, the model generates code step by step guided by the solution steps. The effectiveness of self-planning code generation has been rigorously evaluated on multiple datasets, demonstrating a marked superiority over naive direct generation approaches with LLMs. However, during practice some problems were discovered that need further attention. One issue is that the plan-based approach is still limited by a lack of information in the provided intent. Adding more information such as usage examples or detailed descriptions can improve performance. Another problem is unstable performance due to sensitivity to examples, making it difficult to control what the model learns from prompts. Additionally, replicating irrelevant steps in prompts can occur if there is not enough confidence to generate a plan. The paper suggests exploring beyond code writing into requirements analysis and incorporating requirements engineering methodology with LLMs for software development. Furthermore, solving real-world problems through programs using similar methods as this paper could provide logical and well-thought-out solutions. A case study validates this approach's effectiveness but highlights its limitations as a forward and limited solution. In conclusion, this paper proposes an effective self-planning approach for code generation that outperforms naive direct generation on multiple datasets and discusses promising future works for advancing software engineering one step forward.
- - The paper proposes a self-planning code generation method with large language models (LLMs) to generate complex code from human intent.
- - The approach consists of two phases: planning and implementation.
- - In the planning phase, the LLM plans out solution steps from the provided intent combined with in-context learning.
- - In the implementation phase, the model generates code step by step guided by the solution steps.
- - The self-planning code generation has been evaluated on multiple datasets and demonstrated superiority over naive direct generation approaches with LLMs.
- - However, some problems were discovered during practice that need further attention, such as limited information in provided intent and unstable performance due to sensitivity to examples.
- - The paper suggests exploring beyond code writing into requirements analysis and incorporating requirements engineering methodology with LLMs for software development.
- - A case study validates this approach's effectiveness but highlights its limitations as a forward and limited solution.
This paper talks about a way to make computers write complex code by themselves. They use something called large language models to help them understand what humans want. There are two parts to this process: planning and implementation. In the planning part, the computer figures out how to solve the problem based on what it has learned before. In the implementation part, it actually writes the code step by step using what it figured out in planning. This method is better than other ways of making computers write code, but there are still some problems that need to be fixed. One problem is that sometimes there isn't enough information for the computer to understand what we want it to do. Another problem is that sometimes it doesn't work well with new examples. The paper suggests trying this approach for other parts of software development too, not just writing code.
Definitions- Self-planning: when a computer figures out how to solve a problem by itself
- Code generation: when a computer writes code
- Large language models (LLMs): a type of technology that helps computers understand human language and learn from it
- Implementation: when something is put into action or carried out
Self-Planning Code Generation with Large Language Models
Software development is a complex task that requires code to be written from human intent. To address this difficulty, researchers have proposed the use of large language models (LLMs) for self-planning code generation. This paper presents an effective approach that consists of two phases: planning and implementation. The effectiveness of this method has been rigorously evaluated on multiple datasets and outperforms naive direct generation approaches with LLMs. However, some issues have been identified during practice that need further attention.
The Proposed Approach
The proposed approach consists of two phases: planning and implementation. In the planning phase, the LLM plans out solution steps from the provided intent combined with in-context learning. Then, in the implementation phase, the model generates code step by step guided by the solution steps.
Evaluation Results
The effectiveness of self-planning code generation has been rigorously evaluated on multiple datasets, demonstrating a marked superiority over naive direct generation approaches with LLMs. The results show that this approach can generate more accurate codes than other methods while also being faster at generating them due to its ability to plan out solutions before implementing them into code form.
Issues Discovered During Practice
During practice some problems were discovered that need further attention. One issue is that the plan-based approach is still limited by a lack of information in the provided intent; adding more information such as usage examples or detailed descriptions can improve performance significantly as it provides more context for understanding what needs to be done when generating codes from intents. Another problem is unstable performance due to sensitivity to examples; if there are too many irrelevant examples present then it becomes difficult for models to learn what they should be focusing on when generating codes from intents which leads to inaccurate results or replicating irrelevant steps in prompts if there isn’t enough confidence generated by models about their plans before implementing them into codes form .
Future Works
The paper suggests exploring beyond code writing into requirements analysis and incorporating requirements engineering methodology with LLMs for software development as well as solving real world problems through programs using similar methods as this paper proposes could provide logical and well thought out solutions for various tasks instead of relying solely on manual coding processes which take longer time periods and require more resources than automated ones do . A case study validates this approach's effectiveness but highlights its limitations as a forward and limited solution .
Conclusion
In conclusion , this paper proposes an effective self - planning approach for code generation that outperforms naive direct generation on multiple datasets and discusses promising future works for advancing software engineering one step forward . With further research , these techniques can become even better at providing accurate solutions quickly without requiring manual coding processes which takes longer time periods and require more resources than automated ones do .