Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems

AI-generated keywords: GPT-4 USMLE MultiMedQA Medical Education Accuracy

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • GPT-4, a large language model, evaluated on medical competency examinations and benchmark datasets
  • GPT-4 not specifically trained for medical problems
  • Evaluation focused on USMLE practice materials and MultiMedQA benchmark datasets
  • Study investigates influence of text and image questions, memorization during training, and probability calibration
  • GPT-4 surpasses passing score on USMLE by over 20 points without prompt crafting
  • Outperforms earlier models (GPT 3.5) and models fine-tuned on medical knowledge (Med PaLM)
  • Better calibration than GPT 3.5, indicating improved ability to predict answer correctness
  • Qualitative exploration showcases ability to explain medical reasoning, personalize explanations, and craft new scenarios
  • Implications discussed for potential uses in medical education assessment and clinical practice
  • Challenges related to accuracy and safety mentioned
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Harsha Nori, Nicholas King, Scott Mayer McKinney, Dean Carignan, Eric Horvitz

35 pages, 15 figures; added GPT-4-base model results and discussion

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation across various domains, including medicine. We present a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4, a state-of-the-art LLM, on medical competency examinations and benchmark datasets. GPT-4 is a general-purpose model that is not specialized for medical problems through training or engineered to solve clinical tasks. Our analysis covers two sets of official practice materials for the USMLE, a three-step examination program used to assess clinical competency and grant licensure in the United States. We also evaluate performance on the MultiMedQA suite of benchmark datasets. Beyond measuring model performance, experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of test questions containing both text and images on model performance, probe for memorization of content during training, and study probability calibration, which is of critical importance in high-stakes applications like medicine. Our results show that GPT-4, without any specialized prompt crafting, exceeds the passing score on USMLE by over 20 points and outperforms earlier general-purpose models (GPT-3.5) as well as models specifically fine-tuned on medical knowledge (Med-PaLM, a prompt-tuned version of Flan-PaLM 540B). In addition, GPT-4 is significantly better calibrated than GPT-3.5, demonstrating a much-improved ability to predict the likelihood that its answers are correct. We also explore the behavior of the model qualitatively through a case study that shows the ability of GPT-4 to explain medical reasoning, personalize explanations to students, and interactively craft new counterfactual scenarios around a medical case. Implications of the findings are discussed for potential uses of GPT-4 in medical education, assessment, and clinical practice, with appropriate attention to challenges of accuracy and safety.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Mar. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.13375v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study "Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems," authors Harsha Nori, Nicholas King, Scott Mayer McKinney, Dean Carignan, and Eric Horvitz present a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4, a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM), on medical competency examinations and benchmark datasets. GPT-4 is a general-purpose model that has not been specifically trained or engineered for medical problems. The analysis focuses on two sets of official practice materials for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), a three-step examination program used to assess clinical competency and grant licensure in the United States. Additionally, the performance of GPT-4 is evaluated on the MultiMedQA suite of benchmark datasets. The experiments conducted in this study go beyond measuring model performance. The researchers investigate the influence of test questions containing both text and images on model performance, probe for memorization of content during training, and study probability calibration which is crucial in high stakes applications like medicine. The results demonstrate that GPT-4 surpasses the passing score on USMLE by over 20 points without any specialized prompt crafting. It also outperforms earlier general purpose models (GPT 3.5) as well as models specifically fine tuned on medical knowledge (Med PaLM). Furthermore, GPT 4 exhibits significantly better calibration than GPT 3.5 indicating an improved ability to predict the likelihood that its answers are correct. The researchers also explore the behavior of GPT 4 qualitatively through a case study. They showcase its ability to explain medical reasoning personalize explanations to students and interactively craft new counterfactual scenarios around a medical case. The implications of these findings are discussed in terms of potential uses of GPT 4 in medical education assessment and clinical practice however attention is given to challenges related to accuracy and safety. Overall this study highlights the remarkable capabilities of GPT 4 in natural language understanding and generation in the medical domain providing valuable insights into its performance on medical competency examinations and benchmark datasets as well as its ability to explain medical reasoning and interact with users.
Created on 10 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.