Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors: Lixiang Yan, Lele Sha, Linxuan Zhao, Yuheng Li, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Guanliang Chen, Xinyu Li, Yueqiao Jin, Dragan Gašević

License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2303.13379v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This article presents the findings of a systematic literature review conducted to identify the current state of research on using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate and support educational tasks. The review analyzed 118 peer-reviewed papers published since 2017, focusing on the practical and ethical challenges associated with LLMs-based innovations in education. The study identified concerns regarding technological readiness, model performance, replicability, system transparency, privacy, equality and beneficence of these innovations. To address these issues and support future research in this area three recommendations were proposed: updating existing innovations with state-of-the-art models such as GPT-3; embracing open sourcing models/systems initiative; and adopting a human-centered approach throughout the developmental process. The study also extracted contextual information related to educational tasks, stakeholders involved, LLMs used and machine learning tasks performed by each included paper. Additionally seven data extraction items were developed to assess technology readiness and ethicality based on Australian Department of Defense's Technology Readiness Levels (TRL). The findings provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners exploring viable directions for developing practical and ethical LLMs-based innovations that benefit students, teachers and institutions while addressing potential challenges.
AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Education Technology Readiness Ethicality Human-Centered

AI-generated Key Points

  • Systematic literature review conducted to identify the current state of research on using Large Language Models (LLMs) in education
  • 118 peer-reviewed papers published since 2017 were analyzed
  • Focus on practical and ethical challenges associated with LLMs-based innovations in education
  • Concerns identified regarding technological readiness, model performance, replicability, system transparency, privacy, equality and beneficence of these innovations
  • Three recommendations proposed: updating existing innovations with state-of-the-art models such as GPT-3; embracing open sourcing models/systems initiative; and adopting a human-centered approach throughout the developmental process
  • Contextual information related to educational tasks, stakeholders involved, LLMs used and machine learning tasks performed by each included paper was extracted
  • Seven data extraction items were developed to assess technology readiness and ethicality based on Australian Department of Defense's Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)
  • Findings provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners exploring viable directions for developing practical and ethical LLMs-based innovations that benefit students, teachers and institutions while addressing potential challenges.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Educational technology innovations that have been developed based on large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to automate the laborious process of generating and analysing textual content. While various innovations have been developed to automate a range of educational tasks (e.g., question generation, feedback provision, and essay grading), there are concerns regarding the practicality and ethicality of these innovations. Such concerns may hinder future research and the adoption of LLMs-based innovations in authentic educational contexts. To address this, we conducted a systematic literature review of 118 peer-reviewed papers published since 2017 to pinpoint the current state of research on using LLMs to automate and support educational tasks. The practical and ethical challenges of LLMs-based innovations were also identified by assessing their technological readiness, model performance, replicability, system transparency, privacy, equality, and beneficence. The findings were summarised into three recommendations for future studies, including updating existing innovations with state-of-the-art models (e.g., GPT-3), embracing the initiative of open-sourcing models/systems, and adopting a human-centred approach throughout the developmental process. These recommendations could support future research to develop practical and ethical innovations for supporting diverse educational tasks and benefiting students, teachers, and institutions.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Mar. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.