Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Literature Review
AI-generated Key Points
- Systematic literature review conducted to identify the current state of research on using Large Language Models (LLMs) in education
- 118 peer-reviewed papers published since 2017 were analyzed
- Focus on practical and ethical challenges associated with LLMs-based innovations in education
- Concerns identified regarding technological readiness, model performance, replicability, system transparency, privacy, equality and beneficence of these innovations
- Three recommendations proposed: updating existing innovations with state-of-the-art models such as GPT-3; embracing open sourcing models/systems initiative; and adopting a human-centered approach throughout the developmental process
- Contextual information related to educational tasks, stakeholders involved, LLMs used and machine learning tasks performed by each included paper was extracted
- Seven data extraction items were developed to assess technology readiness and ethicality based on Australian Department of Defense's Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)
- Findings provide valuable insights for researchers and practitioners exploring viable directions for developing practical and ethical LLMs-based innovations that benefit students, teachers and institutions while addressing potential challenges.
Authors: Lixiang Yan, Lele Sha, Linxuan Zhao, Yuheng Li, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Guanliang Chen, Xinyu Li, Yueqiao Jin, Dragan Gašević
Abstract: Educational technology innovations that have been developed based on large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to automate the laborious process of generating and analysing textual content. While various innovations have been developed to automate a range of educational tasks (e.g., question generation, feedback provision, and essay grading), there are concerns regarding the practicality and ethicality of these innovations. Such concerns may hinder future research and the adoption of LLMs-based innovations in authentic educational contexts. To address this, we conducted a systematic literature review of 118 peer-reviewed papers published since 2017 to pinpoint the current state of research on using LLMs to automate and support educational tasks. The practical and ethical challenges of LLMs-based innovations were also identified by assessing their technological readiness, model performance, replicability, system transparency, privacy, equality, and beneficence. The findings were summarised into three recommendations for future studies, including updating existing innovations with state-of-the-art models (e.g., GPT-3), embracing the initiative of open-sourcing models/systems, and adopting a human-centred approach throughout the developmental process. These recommendations could support future research to develop practical and ethical innovations for supporting diverse educational tasks and benefiting students, teachers, and institutions.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.