Using Language Models For Knowledge Acquisition in Natural Language Reasoning Problems
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to solve natural language problems that require non-trivial reasoning.
- Two methods of using LLMs are compared: asking them to directly solve the problem or extracting facts from the problem text and using a theorem prover to solve it.
- ChatGPT and GPT4 were used on a series of logic word puzzles, and the authors conclude that the latter approach is more effective.
- The paper highlights the importance of knowledge acquisition in natural language processing tasks.
- Combining LLMs with other tools can improve performance.
- This research contributes to ongoing efforts to develop more sophisticated natural language processing techniques for complex problem-solving tasks.
Authors: Fangzhen Lin, Ziyi Shou, Chengcai Chen
Abstract: For a natural language problem that requires some non-trivial reasoning to solve, there are at least two ways to do it using a large language model (LLM). One is to ask it to solve it directly. The other is to use it to extract the facts from the problem text and then use a theorem prover to solve it. In this note, we compare the two methods using ChatGPT and GPT4 on a series of logic word puzzles, and conclude that the latter is the right approach.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.