Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.08979v1

The advent of ChatGPT has brought about a paradigm shift in the way users acquire information. Unlike conventional search engines, ChatGPT retrieves knowledge from the model itself and generates answers for users. However, concerns have been raised regarding its reliability. In this paper, the authors perform the first large-scale measurement of ChatGPT's reliability in generic question-answering scenarios with a carefully curated set of 5,695 questions across ten datasets and eight domains. The study finds that ChatGPT's reliability varies across different domains, especially underperforming in law and science questions. The authors also demonstrate that system roles can impact ChatGPT's reliability and that it is vulnerable to adversarial examples. Thematic analysis was used to categorize samples based on their similarity in terms of semantics and domains, facilitating meaningful comparisons. The final codebook includes eight codes/domains: history, law, general works, medicine, social science, science, technology and recreation. The study provides valuable insights into ChatGPT's reliability and underscores the need for strengthening the reliability and security of large language models (LLMs).

• - ChatGPT retrieves knowledge from the model itself and generates answers for users
• - Concerns have been raised regarding its reliability
• - The authors perform the first large-scale measurement of ChatGPT's reliability in generic question-answering scenarios with a carefully curated set of 5,695 questions across ten datasets and eight domains
• - ChatGPT's reliability varies across different domains, especially underperforming in law and science questions
• - System roles can impact ChatGPT's reliability and it is vulnerable to adversarial examples
• - Thematic analysis was used to categorize samples based on their similarity in terms of semantics and domains, facilitating meaningful comparisons
• - The final codebook includes eight codes/domains: history, law, general works, medicine, social science, science, technology and recreation
• - The study provides valuable insights into ChatGPT's reliability
• - There is a need for strengthening the reliability and security of large language models (LLMs)

ChatGPT is a computer program that can answer questions. People are worried about whether it always gives the right answers. Some people tested ChatGPT by asking it many different questions in different areas like history, law, and science. They found out that ChatGPT sometimes makes mistakes, especially when answering law and science questions. The way people use ChatGPT can also make it give wrong answers. The people who did the test made categories for the questions to help them understand how well ChatGPT works in different areas. This study helps us learn more about how good ChatGPT is at answering questions, but we need to make sure it's always reliable and safe to use because it's a very big language program. Definitions- ChatGPT: A computer program that can answer questions. - Reliability: How much you can trust something to work correctly all the time. - Large-scale measurement: Testing something on a big scale with lots of examples. - Domains: Different areas or subjects of knowledge. - Adversarial examples: Tricky or misleading inputs given to a machine learning model to cause it to make mistakes. - Thematic analysis: A way of grouping things together based on their similarities in themes or topics. - Codebook: A set of categories used for organizing data in research studies. - Language models (LLMs): Computer programs that are designed to understand human language and generate text based on what they've learned from large amounts of data.

The Advent of ChatGPT: A Paradigm Shift in Knowledge Retrieval

In recent years, the development of large language models (LLMs) has enabled a new way for users to acquire information. Unlike conventional search engines, LLMs such as ChatGPT can retrieve knowledge from the model itself and generate answers for users. However, questions have been raised regarding its reliability. A research paper recently published by authors at Carnegie Mellon University sought to measure the reliability of ChatGPT in generic question-answering scenarios with a carefully curated set of 5,695 questions across ten datasets and eight domains. The study found that ChatGPT's reliability varies across different domains, particularly underperforming in law and science questions. Additionally, it was demonstrated that system roles can impact ChatGPT's reliability and that it is vulnerable to adversarial examples.

Methodology

The researchers used thematic analysis to categorize samples based on their similarity in terms of semantics and domains. This facilitated meaningful comparisons between results from different datasets and domains. The final codebook included eight codes/domains: history, law, general works, medicine, social science, science technology and recreation.

Results

The study found that while overall accuracy was high (87%), there were significant differences between individual domains; notably law (77%) and science (75%). It was also observed that system roles had an effect on accuracy; when the role was changed from “questioner” to “answerer” accuracy decreased significantly (-11%). Furthermore, it was shown that adversarial examples could be crafted which caused ChatGPT to fail completely or provide incorrect answers without any indication of uncertainty or error correction capabilities being triggered by the model itself.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into ChatGPT's reliability as well as potential areas for improvement such as increasing robustness against adversarial examples or developing better error correction capabilities within the model itself. Moreover, this research underscores the need for strengthening the security of large language models so they can be safely deployed in real-world applications where reliable information retrieval is essential for success