Genetic-Algorithm-Based Proportional Integral Controller (GAPI) for ROV Steering Control
AI-generated Key Points
- Innovative approach: Genetic algorithm-based proportional integral controller (GAPI) for optimizing steering control of ROVs
- Comparison with other tuning methods: GAPI vs root-locus-tuned PI controller and simulated-annealing-based PI controller (SAPI)
- Performance evaluation: GAPI provides considerably better performance in terms of overshoot, peak time, and settling time
- Effectiveness of meta-heuristic optimization techniques: Genetic algorithms can optimize relatively straightforward controllers like PI controllers
- Potential for future research: Similar optimization techniques can be applied to develop advanced controllers for complex systems
- Authors' contributions: Conceptualization, methodology development, software implementation, validation, analysis, investigation, data curation, draft preparation, visualization, supervision, project administration
- Funding and approval information: No external funding or Institutional Review Board approval was involved in the research.
Authors: Ahsan Tanveer, Sarvat Mushtaq Ahmad
Abstract: This article presents the design and real-time implementation of an optimal controller for precise steering control of a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV). A PI controller is investigated to achieve the desired steering performance. The gain parameters of the controller are tuned using the genetic algorithm (GA). The experimental response corresponding to the step waveform for the GA is obtained. A root-locus-tuned PI controller alongside a simulated-annealing-based PI controller (SAPI) is used to benchmark the response characteristics such as overshoot, peak time, and settling time. The experimental findings indicate that GAPI provides considerably better performance than SAPI and the root-locus-tuned controller.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.