Exploring the Use of ChatGPT as a Tool for Learning and Assessment in Undergraduate Computer Science Curriculum: Opportunities and Challenges

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT Teaching and Learning Undergraduate Computer Science Curriculum Higher Education

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning has gained significant attention in computing education
  • ChatGPT, an AI-based tool, enhances student involvement, cooperation, and accessibility
  • The study focuses on using ChatGPT for learning and assessment in undergraduate Computer Science curriculum, specifically for fundamental programming courses
  • Two groups of students were given programming challenges, with one group having access to ChatGPT and the other group having no internet access
  • Students using ChatGPT had an advantage in terms of earned scores compared to the control group
  • Inconsistencies and inaccuracies were observed in the submitted code by students using ChatGPT
  • Incorporating AI tools like ChatGPT into higher education presents opportunities and challenges
  • There is a need to address issues related to accuracy and consistency when utilizing AI-based tools for learning and assessment purposes
  • Integrating AI into undergraduate Computer Science curriculum through tools like ChatGPT can enhance teaching and learning experiences while navigating complexities introduced by AI technologies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Basit Qureshi

8 pages, 4 figures

Abstract: The application of Artificial intelligence for teaching and learning in the academic sphere is a trending subject of interest in the computing education. ChatGPT, as an AI-based tool, provides various advantages, such as heightened student involvement, cooperation, accessibility and availability. This paper addresses the prospects and obstacles associated with utilizing ChatGPT as a tool for learning and assessment in undergraduate Computer Science curriculum in particular to teaching and learning fundamental programming courses. Students having completed the course work for a Data Structures and Algorithms (a sophomore level course) participated in this study. Two groups of students were given programming challenges to solve within a short period of time. The control group (group A) had access to text books and notes of programming courses, however no Internet access was provided. Group B students were given access to ChatGPT and were encouraged to use it to help solve the programming challenges. The challenge was conducted in a computer lab environment using PC2 environment. Each team of students address the problem by writing executable code that satisfies certain number of test cases. Student teams were scored based on their performance in terms of number of successful passed testcases. Results show that students using ChatGPT had an advantage in terms of earned scores, however there were inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the submitted code consequently affecting the overall performance. After a thorough analysis, the paper's findings indicate that incorporating AI in higher education brings about various opportunities and challenges.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.11214v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning has gained significant attention in the field of computing education. One AI-based tool, ChatGPT, has shown promise in enhancing student involvement, cooperation, and accessibility. This paper focuses on exploring the potential benefits and challenges of using ChatGPT as a tool for learning and assessment in undergraduate Computer Science curriculum, specifically for fundamental programming courses. The study involved students who had completed a Data Structures and Algorithms course at the sophomore level. Two groups of students were given programming challenges to solve within a limited time frame. The control group (group A) had access to textbooks and notes related to programming courses but no internet access. On the other hand, group B students were provided with access to ChatGPT and encouraged to utilize it for assistance in solving the programming challenges. The challenge took place in a computer lab environment using the PC2 platform. Each team of students approached the problem by writing executable code that satisfied a specific number of test cases. Their performance was evaluated based on the number of successfully passed test cases. The results revealed that students using ChatGPT had an advantage in terms of earned scores compared to the control group. However, there were inconsistencies and inaccuracies observed in the submitted code, which ultimately affected overall performance. After conducting a thorough analysis, this paper concludes that incorporating AI tools like ChatGPT into higher education presents both opportunities and challenges. While it enhances student engagement and accessibility to resources, there is also a need for addressing issues related to accuracy and consistency when utilizing AI-based tools for learning and assessment purposes. Overall, this research sheds light on the potential benefits and obstacles associated with integrating AI into undergraduate Computer Science curriculum through tools like ChatGPT. It provides valuable insights for educators seeking innovative ways to enhance teaching and learning experiences in programming courses while navigating the complexities introduced by AI technologies.
Created on 05 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.