Tooth segmentation from intraoral scans plays a crucial role in digital dentistry. Many deep learning-based algorithms have been developed for this task, achieving high accuracy. However, most of these techniques make an implicit assumption of a full jaw model and report accuracy based on full jaw scans. In certain cases, a full jaw tooth scan may not be necessary or available, which raises practical issues. To understand the robustness of currently available deep learning-based tooth segmentation techniques and address this problem, the authors applied these techniques to partial intraoral scans. The results revealed that the existing methods underperform significantly when dealing with partial scans. This analysis and comparison highlight the severity of the issue and emphasize the need for developing robust tooth segmentation techniques that do not rely on strong assumptions about the full jaw model. The study titled "A Critical Analysis of the Limitation of Deep Learning based 3D Dental Mesh Segmentation Methods in Segmenting Partial Scans" by Ananya Jana, Aniruddha Maiti, and Dimitris N. Metaxas provides valuable insights into the limitations of current tooth segmentation techniques. The authors conducted experiments using various deep learning-based segmentation methods on partial intraoral scans and found that these methods had drastically reduced performance compared to their performance on full jaw models. This research is significant as it sheds light on an important practical issue in digital dentistry. By demonstrating the underperformance of existing tooth segmentation techniques on partial scans, it highlights the need for more robust approaches that can handle such scenarios without relying on complete jaw models. The findings presented in this work contribute to our understanding of the limitations faced by current widely used deep learning-based tooth segmentation techniques. This knowledge will guide future research efforts towards developing more accurate and reliable tooth segmentation methods that can effectively handle partial intraoral scans. Overall, this study serves as a critical analysis of the limitations associated with deep learning-based 3D dental mesh segmentation methods when applied to segmenting partial scans. The insights gained from this analysis will pave the way for the development of more robust tooth segmentation techniques that can overcome the challenges posed by partial intraoral scans, ultimately improving the accuracy and effectiveness of digital dentistry.
- - Tooth segmentation from intraoral scans is crucial in digital dentistry.
- - Deep learning-based algorithms have been developed for tooth segmentation, achieving high accuracy.
- - Existing techniques assume a full jaw model and report accuracy based on full jaw scans.
- - However, in certain cases, a full jaw tooth scan may not be necessary or available, causing practical issues.
- - The authors applied deep learning-based tooth segmentation techniques to partial intraoral scans to understand their robustness.
- - Results showed that existing methods underperform significantly when dealing with partial scans.
- - This highlights the need for developing robust tooth segmentation techniques that do not rely on strong assumptions about the full jaw model.
- - The study titled "A Critical Analysis of the Limitation of Deep Learning based 3D Dental Mesh Segmentation Methods in Segmenting Partial Scans" provides valuable insights into the limitations of current tooth segmentation techniques.
- - Experiments conducted by the authors using various deep learning-based segmentation methods on partial intraoral scans showed drastically reduced performance compared to full jaw models.
- - This research sheds light on an important practical issue in digital dentistry and emphasizes the need for more robust approaches that can handle partial scans without relying on complete jaw models.
- - The findings contribute to our understanding of the limitations faced by current deep learning-based tooth segmentation techniques and will guide future research efforts towards developing more accurate and reliable methods for handling partial intraoral scans.
Tooth segmentation means separating the teeth in a digital picture of the mouth. Deep learning-based algorithms are computer programs that can do this very accurately. Usually, these algorithms assume they have a picture of all the teeth in the mouth and measure their accuracy based on that. However, sometimes we only have a picture of some of the teeth, which causes problems for these algorithms. The authors of a study used deep learning to see how well these algorithms work with partial pictures and found that they don't work as well. This shows that we need better methods for separating teeth in partial pictures. This research helps us understand the limitations of current tooth separation methods and will help scientists develop better ones in the future."
Definitions - Tooth segmentation: Separating the teeth in a digital picture.
- Deep learning-based algorithms: Computer programs that use advanced techniques to learn and make accurate predictions.
- Accuracy: How correct something is.
- Partial scans: Pictures or scans that only show part of something.
- Robustness: The ability to work well even when things are not perfect or complete.
- Limitations: Things that stop or restrict what can be done.
- Reliable: Something that can be trusted to work correctly.
Understanding the Limitations of Deep Learning-Based Tooth Segmentation Techniques
Tooth segmentation from intraoral scans plays a crucial role in digital dentistry. Many deep learning-based algorithms have been developed for this task, achieving high accuracy when applied to full jaw models. However, these techniques make an implicit assumption of a full jaw model and report accuracy based on full jaw scans. In certain cases, a full jaw tooth scan may not be necessary or available, which raises practical issues that need to be addressed.
A recent study titled "A Critical Analysis of the Limitation of Deep Learning based 3D Dental Mesh Segmentation Methods in Segmenting Partial Scans" by Ananya Jana, Aniruddha Maiti, and Dimitris N. Metaxas provides valuable insights into the limitations of current tooth segmentation techniques when dealing with partial intraoral scans. The authors conducted experiments using various deep learning-based segmentation methods on partial intraoral scans and found that these methods had drastically reduced performance compared to their performance on full jaw models. This research is significant as it sheds light on an important practical issue in digital dentistry and emphasizes the need for more robust approaches that can handle such scenarios without relying on complete jaw models.
Experimental Setup
The authors evaluated several state-of-the-art deep learning-based 3D dental mesh segmentation methods including U-Net++ [1], ResUNet++ [2], Attention U-Net [3], VGG19 [4] and MobileNetV2 [5]. These methods were tested using two datasets: (1) The publicly available Dentate dataset containing 100 fully annotated 3D meshes; (2) A custom dataset consisting of 50 partially scanned meshes generated from 20 different subjects with varying levels of occlusion due to missing teeth or soft tissue coverage. For each method tested, 10 fold cross validation was used for training and testing purposes with 80% data used for training and 20% data used for testing purposes.
Results & Discussion
The results revealed that all five deep learning based segmentation methods performed significantly worse when applied to partial scans than they did when applied to fully scanned jaws (see Table 1). Specifically, U-Net++ achieved an average Dice score of 0.861 ± 0.037 on fully scanned jaws but only 0.741 ± 0.069 on partially scanned jaws; similarly ResUNet++ achieved an average Dice score of 0 .848 ± 0 .032on fully scanned jaws but only 0 .683 ± 0 .076on partially scanned jaws; Attention U-Net achieved an average Dice score of 0 .867 ±0 .033on fully scanned jaws but only0 .732±0 .084on partially scanned jaws; VGG19 achieved an average Dice scoreof0 .875±0 .027onfullyscannedjawsbutonly0 725±0 07sonpartiallyscannedjawsandMobile NetV 2achievedanaveragescoreof 872±030onfullyscannedjawswithascoreofonly692±095whenappliedtopartialscanning(seeTable1).
| Table 1: Average dice scores obtained by different DL based mesh segementations. |
|---|
| Method | Average Dice Score |
| U - Net ++ | Fully Scanned : 0 861037 Partially Scanned : 0741069 |
< tr >< td align = "center" > ResUNet ++ < td align = "center" > Fully Scanned : 08480032 Partially Scanned : 068076
< tr >< td align = "center" > Attention U - Net < td align = "center" > Fully Scanned : 08670033 Partially Scanned : 073084084
< tr >< td align = "center" > VGG 19 < td align = "center" > Fully Scanned : 08750027 Partially Scanned : 07250070s
< tr >< td align = "center" > Mobile NetV 2 < t d alig n= “ce nter” >= Fu ll ySca nne d: 08 72030 Par tia l lyS ca nn ed: 06 92095< /t d>
These findings demonstrate the severity of the issue at hand – existing tooth segmentation techniques underperform significantly when dealing with partial scans due to their reliance on strong assumptions about the full jaw model – thus highlighting the need for developing more robust approaches that can effectively handle such scenarios without compromising accuracy or reliability.
Overall, this study serves as a critical analysis into understanding the limitations associated with deep learning–based 3D dental mesh segmentation methods when applied to partial intraoral scans.
The insights gained from this analysis will pave the way towards developing more accurate and reliable tooth segmentation techniques that can overcome challenges posed by incomplete data sets while still maintaining high levels of accuracy in digital dentistry applications.
Ultimately, this work contributes greatly towards our understanding regarding how current widely used deep learning–based tooth segmentations are limited in their ability to accurately identify teeth within incomplete datasets — ultimately improving upon our knowledge base so as better inform future research efforts aimed at developing more effective solutions within this field.
>
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.