Construct sparse portfolio with mutual fund's favourite stocks in China A share market

AI-generated keywords: China A share market mutual funds stock selectivity sparse portfolio quantitative approach

AI-generated Key Points

  • China A share market has been dominated by retail and unprofessional trading in the last 20 years
  • Professional investors have consistently generated excess returns compared to the total market index through their stock selectivity ability
  • Quantitative approach was used to construct a sparse portfolio that takes advantage of favorite stocks by mutual funds in China A market
  • Mutual funds outperformed the total market index due to inefficiencies in emerging markets
  • Two portfolios were built: one with high correlation (0.985) and another low-risk balanced portfolio that consistently outperformed the partial equity funds index regarding return and Sharpe ratio
  • Each industry exposure of the portfolio was restricted within 10% to reduce sector risk and build a more balanced portfolio
  • The resulting industry exposure graph showed that while Industry, Finance, Health care were all around 10%, they were lower than their weight in 930950.CSI. Energy and Utility were overweight compared with 930950.CSI.
  • Our portfolio had better total return, lower volatility, and higher Sharpe ratio compared with either partial equity funds index or total market index.
  • Our portfolio had lower maximum drawdown than both benchmark indices.
  • Constructing a sparse portfolio with mutual fund's favorite stocks in China A share market using quantitative methods can lead to excess returns.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ke Zhang

arXiv: 2305.01642v1 - DOI (q-fin.PM)
Portfolio construction, Sparsity, Index tracking, Mutual fund, China A share market
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Unlike developed market, some emerging markets are dominated by retail and unprofessional trading. China A share market is a good and fitting example in last 20 years. Meanwhile, lots of research show professional investor in China A share market continuously generate excess return compare with total market index. Specifically, this excess return mostly come from stock selectivity ability instead of market timing. However for some reason such as fund capacity limit, fund manager change or market regional switch, it is very hard to find a fund could continuously beat market. Therefore, in order to get excess return from mutual fund industry, we use quantitative way to build the sparse portfolio that take advantage of favorite stocks by mutual fund in China A market. Firstly we do the analysis about favourite stocks by mutual fund and compare the different method to construct our portfolio. Then we build a sparse stock portfolio with constraint on both individual stock and industry exposure using portfolio optimizer to closely track the partial equity funds index 930950.CSI with median 0.985 correlation. This problem is much more difficult than tracking full information index or traditional ETF as higher turnover of mutual fund, just first 10 holding of mutual fund available and fund report updated quarterly with 15 days delay. Finally we build another low risk and balanced sparse portfolio that consistently outperform benchmark 930950.CSI.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Apr. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.01642v1

The China A share market has been dominated by retail and unprofessional trading in the last 20 years, unlike developed markets. However, professional investors in this market have consistently generated excess returns compared to the total market index through their stock selectivity ability. To achieve excess returns from the mutual fund industry, a quantitative approach was used to construct a sparse portfolio that takes advantage of favorite stocks by mutual funds in China A market. The first step was an analysis of mutual funds and their holdings in China A share market. The research showed that mutual funds outperformed the total market index due to inefficiencies in emerging markets. Next, different methods were compared for constructing a sparse portfolio with individual stock and industry exposure constraints to track partial equity fund index. Finally, two portfolios were built: one with high correlation (0.985) and another low-risk balanced portfolio that consistently outperformed the partial equity funds index regarding return and Sharpe ratio. To reduce sector risk and build a more balanced portfolio, each industry exposure of our portfolio was restricted within 10%. The resulting industry exposure graph showed that while Industry, Finance, Health care were all around 10%, they were lower than their weight in 930950.CSI. Energy and Utility were overweight compared with 930950.CSI. The performance of our portfolio was compared with benchmark indices using total return (%), volatility (Vol), and Sharpe ratio calculated by log return. Our portfolio had better total return, lower volatility and higher Sharpe ratio compared with either partial equity funds index or total market index. Furthermore, we analyzed maximum drawdowns of three strategies which revealed that our portfolio had lower maximum drawdown than both benchmark indices. We also considered using portfolio return minus benchmark indices which showed two equity curves gradually going up, indicating that our portfolio could beat these two indices in the long term. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that constructing a sparse portfolio with mutual fund's favorite stocks in China A share market using quantitative methods can lead to excess returns.
Created on 21 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.