How to Use Reinforcement Learning to Facilitate Future Electricity Market Design? Part 1: A Paradigmatic Theory

Authors: Ziqing Zhu, Siqi Bu, Ka Wing Chan, Bin Zhou, Shiwei Xia

It is old version with mistakes

Abstract: In face of the pressing need of decarbonization in the power sector, the re-design of electricity market is necessary as a Marco-level approach to accommodate the high penetration of renewable generations, and to achieve power system operation security, economic efficiency, and environmental friendliness. However, existing market design methodologies suffer from the lack of coordination among energy spot market (ESM), ancillary service market (ASM) and financial market (FM), i.e., the "joint market", and the lack of reliable simulation-based verification. To tackle these deficiencies, this two-part paper develops a paradigmatic theory and detailed methods of the joint market design using reinforcement-learning (RL)-based simulation. In Part 1, the theory and framework of this novel market design philosophy are proposed. First, the controversial market design options while designing the joint market are summarized as the targeted research questions. Second, the Markov game model is developed to describe the bidding game in the joint market, incorporating the market design options to be determined. Third, a framework of deploying multiple types of RL algorithms to simulate the market model is developed. Finally, several market operation performance indicators are proposed to validate the market design based on the simulation results.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.02485v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 31 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.