Isomorphisms between dense random graphs

AI-generated keywords: Isomorphisms Dense Random Graphs Induced Subgraph Isomorphism Problem Binomial Random Graphs Threshold Result

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors: Erlang Surya, Lutz Warnke, and Emily Zhu
  • Focus on induced subgraph isomorphism problem in binomial random graphs with edge-probabilities p_1 and p_2
  • Sharp threshold result for emergence of G_{n,p_1} as an induced subgraph of G_{N,p_2}
  • Two-point concentration concerning maximum common induced subgraph shared by G_{N,p_1} and G_{N,p_2}
  • Unusual limiting distribution observed in number of induced copies of G_{n,p_1} present in G_{N,p_2}
  • Research significantly advances knowledge of isomorphisms between dense random graphs
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Erlang Surya, Lutz Warnke, Emily Zhu

26 pages, 2 figures

Abstract: We consider two variants of the induced subgraph isomorphism problem for two independent binomial random graphs with constant edge-probabilities p_1,p_2. We resolve several open problems of Chatterjee and Diaconis, and also confirm simulation-based predictions of McCreesh, Prosser, Solnon and Trimble: (i) we prove a sharp threshold result for the appearance of G_{n,p_1} as an induced subgraph of G_{N,p_2}, (ii) we show two-point concentration of the maximum common induced subgraph of G_{N, p_1} and G_{N,p_2}, and (iii) we show that the number of induced copies of G_{n,p_1} in G_{N,p_2} has an unusual limiting distribution.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.04850v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Isomorphisms between dense random graphs," authors Erlang Surya, Lutz Warnke, and Emily Zhu delve into the induced subgraph isomorphism problem within the realm of binomial random graphs with constant edge-probabilities p_1 and p_2. Building upon the work of Chatterjee, Diaconis, McCreesh, Prosser, Solnon, and Trimble, the authors make significant contributions to this field. The study focuses on two key variants of the induced subgraph isomorphism problem. Firstly, they establish a sharp threshold result for the emergence of G_{n,p_1} as an induced subgraph of G_{N,p_2}. This result not only resolves open questions posed by previous researchers but also sheds light on the intricate dynamics at play in random graph structures. Secondly, the authors demonstrate two-point concentration concerning the maximum common induced subgraph shared by G_{N,p_1} and G_{N,p_2}. This finding adds depth to our understanding of how these random graphs interact and form connections within their respective structures. Lastly, a particularly intriguing discovery made by Surya et al. pertains to the unusual limiting distribution observed in the number of induced copies of G_{n,p_1} present in G_{N,p_2}. This unique distribution highlights the complexity and unpredictability inherent in such systems. Overall, through rigorous analysis and innovative approaches, Erlang Surya, Lutz Warnke, and Emily Zhu's research significantly advances our knowledge of isomorphisms between dense random graphs. Their findings not only address existing gaps in this area but also pave the way for future investigations into the fascinating world of random graph theory.
Created on 23 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.