.In their study titled "Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? An Examination on Several Typical Tasks," Xianzhi Li, Xiaodan Zhu, Zhiqiang Ma, Xiaomo Liu, and Sameena Shah explore the potential of large language models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 in solving financial text analytic problems. While these models have been extensively tested on generic text corpora and proven to generate high-quality responses, their performance on financial corpora has not been thoroughly examined. To bridge this gap, the authors conduct a preliminary study to assess the capabilities of ChatGPT and GPT-4 in a zero-shot or few-shot setting on four representative tasks using five distinct financial textual datasets. The results reveal that while these models excel in numerical reasoning tasks, they struggle with tasks like financial named entity recognition (NER) and sentiment analysis that require domain-specific knowledge. The study also compares the strengths and limitations of ChatGPT and GPT-4 with state-of-the-art finetuned models as well as pretrained domain-specific generative models. Through qualitative experiments, the authors aim to provide insights into the existing models' capabilities and contribute to further improvements in this field. Overall, this research sheds light on the applicability of large language models like ChatGPT and GPT-4 in solving financial text analytic problems by identifying their strengths and weaknesses. It paves the way for future advancements in leveraging these models for more accurate and effective financial analysis.
- - Study examines potential of ChatGPT and GPT-4 in solving financial text analytic problems
- - Models have been extensively tested on generic text corpora but not on financial corpora
- - Preliminary study assesses capabilities of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on four representative tasks using five financial textual datasets
- - Models excel in numerical reasoning tasks but struggle with financial named entity recognition (NER) and sentiment analysis
- - Study compares strengths and limitations of ChatGPT and GPT-4 with finetuned models and domain-specific generative models
- - Qualitative experiments provide insights into existing models' capabilities
- - Research sheds light on applicability of large language models in solving financial text analytic problems
- - Identifies strengths and weaknesses of ChatGPT and GPT-4 for future advancements in leveraging these models for financial analysis.
A study looked at how two computer programs, called ChatGPT and GPT-4, can help solve problems with financial text. These programs have been tested a lot on regular text but not as much on financial text. The study looked at how well the programs could do four different tasks using five sets of financial text. The programs were good at understanding numbers but had trouble recognizing certain words and understanding feelings in the text. The study compared the strengths and weaknesses of these programs with other similar ones that were made specifically for finance. By doing this research, we learned more about what these programs can do and where they need to improve."
Definitions- Potential: What something is able to do or become.
- Analytic: Looking closely at something to understand it better.
- Corpora: A collection of written or spoken texts used for studying or analyzing language.
- Excel: To be very good at something.
- Struggle: To have difficulty with something.
- Named entity recognition (NER): Finding and identifying specific words or phrases in a text.
- Sentiment analysis: Understanding the emotions or opinions expressed in a piece of writing.
- Finetuned models: Computer programs that have been adjusted or improved for a specific purpose.
- Domain-specific generative models: Computer programs that are designed for a particular area of knowledge or expertise.
Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics?
In their study titled "Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? An Examination on Several Typical Tasks," Xianzhi Li, Xiaodan Zhu, Zhiqiang Ma, Xiaomo Liu, and Sameena Shah explore the potential of large language models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 in solving financial text analytic problems. While these models have been extensively tested on generic text corpora and proven to generate high-quality responses, their performance on financial corpora has not been thoroughly examined. To bridge this gap, the authors conduct a preliminary study to assess the capabilities of ChatGPT and GPT-4 in a zero-shot or few-shot setting on four representative tasks using five distinct financial textual datasets.
Background Information
Large language models such as ChatGPT (Chatbot Generative PreTraining) and GTPT (Generative PreTraining Transformer) are powerful tools that can be used to solve various natural language processing tasks. These models have been trained with large amounts of data from different sources including news articles, books, conversations etc., which allows them to generate high quality responses when given an input sentence. However, their performance on financial texts has not yet been fully explored due to lack of research in this area.
Objective
The objective of this study is to evaluate the capabilities of two large language models - ChatGpt and GTPT - in solving financial text analytics problems by assessing their performance on four representative tasks using five distinct financial textual datasets. The authors also aim to compare the strengths and limitations of these two models with state-of-the art finetuned models as well as pretrained domain specific generative models.
Methodology
To evaluate the performance of both ChatGpt and GTPT on four typical tasks related to financial text analytics - numerical reasoning task (NRT), sentiment analysis task (SAT), named entity recognition task (NER), document summarization task (DST) - five distinct datasets were used: Bloomberg News Dataset; S&P 500 Earnings Call Transcripts; SEC Filings; StockTwits Messages; Twitter Sentiment Analysis Dataset. For each dataset a set of questions was created based on its content that would test how well both model could perform each respective task without any prior training or fine tuning for that particular dataset/task combination.
Results & Discussion
The results revealed that while both model performed very well at NRT they struggled with other tasks like SAT where they had difficulty recognizing domain specific words or phrases which made it difficult for them to accurately classify sentiment scores associated with certain statements or documents correctly . They also had difficulty understanding complex relationships between entities mentioned within documents which hindered their ability to accurately recognize named entities within those documents during NER tests . Lastly , while both model were able generate summaries from given documents , they often failed capture important details within those summaries making them less accurate than human generated ones .
When compared against state–of–the–art finetuned models as well as pretrained domain specific generative models , it was found that while both model did outperform some existing solutions , there was still room for improvement especially when it came more complex tasks like SAT , NER & DST . Through qualitative experiments , the authors aimed provide insights into existing model’s capabilities & contribute further improvements in this field .
Conclusion
Overall , this research sheds light applicability large language models like Chatgpt & gtpt solving financial text analytic problems by identifying strengths weaknesses It paves way future advancements leveraging these more accurate effective analysis