AI summary · arXiv: 2305.06983v1 · cs.CL
Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
The essentials
- The paper proposes a retrieval-augmented generation method to address the issue of large language models generating factually inaccurate output.
- Existing retrieval-augmented LMs retrieve information only once based on the input, limiting their ability to generate long texts.
- The authors propose a generalized view of active retrieval augmented generation which actively decides when and what to retrieve across the course of the generation process.
- This is implemented in Forward-Looking Active Retrieval augmented generation (FLARE), a generic retrieval-augmented generation method that iteratively uses a prediction of the upcoming sentence to anticipate future content and retrieve relevant documents to regenerate low-confidence tokens.
- FLARE is evaluated along with baselines over four knowledge-intensive datasets and demonstrates superior or competitive performance on all tasks.
- Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/jzbjyb/FLARE.
- The paper is authored by Zhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, Luyu Gao, Zhiqing Sun, Qian Liu, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Yiming Yang, Jamie Callan and Graham Neubig.
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Continue with Google Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation SynergyZhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen et al. · 2023 · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · cited 287 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation has raise extensive attention as it is promising to address the limitations of large language models including outdated knowledge and hallucinations.However, retrievers struggle to capture relevance, especially for queries with complex information needs.Recent work has proposed to improve relevance modeling by having large language models actively involved in retrieval, i.e., to guide retrieval with generation.In this paper, we show that strong performance can be achieved by a method we call ITER-RETGEN, which synergizes retrieval and generation in an iterative manner: a model's response to a task input shows what might be needed to finish the task, and thus ca…
-
Corrective Retrieval Augmented GenerationShi-Qi Yan, Jia-Chen Gu, Yun Zhu et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 353 times · AI summary available
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) inevitably exhibit hallucinations since the accuracy of generated texts cannot be secured solely by the parametric knowledge they encapsulate. Although retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a practicable complement to LLMs, it relies heavily on the relevance of retrieved documents, raising concerns about how the model behaves if retrieval goes wrong. To this end, we propose the Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) to improve the robustness of generation. Specifically, a lightweight retrieval evaluator is designed to assess the overall quality of retrieved documents for a query, returning a confidence degree based on which different knowledge retriev…
-
Parametric Retrieval Augmented GenerationWei-Hang Su, Yi-Chen Tang, Qing-Yao Ai et al. · 2025 · Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · cited 70 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising solution to enhance the reliability of large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge. Existing RAG methods share a common strategy for knowledge injection: they place the retrieved documents into the input context of the LLM, which we refer to as the in-context knowledge injection method. While this approach is simple and often effective, it has inherent limitations. Firstly, increasing the context length and number of relevant documents can lead to higher computational overhead and degraded performance, especially in complex reasoning tasks. More importantly, in-context knowledge injection operates primarily at the input…
-
Dynamic and Parametric Retrieval Augmented GenerationWei-Hang Su, Qian Dong, Qing-Yao Ai et al. · 2025 · SIGIR-AP · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a foundational paradigm for equipping large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, playing a critical role in information retrieval and knowledge-intensive applications. However, conventional RAG systems typically adopt a static retrieve-then-generate pipeline and rely on in-context knowledge injection, which can be suboptimal for complex tasks that require multihop reasoning, adaptive information access, and deeper integration of external knowledge. Motivated by these limitations, the research community has moved beyond static retrieval and in-context knowledge injection. Among the emerging directions, this tutorial delves into two ra…
-
Latent Retrieval Augmented GenerationShuran Zhou, Junan Chen, Rui Ling et al. · 2026 · Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising solution to enhance the reliability of large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge. Existing RAG methods operate in explicit representation spaces: in-context methods inject knowledge through text tokens in the input, while parametric methods like Parametric RAG encode documents into model parameters. Although effective, these approaches face inherent limitations. In-context injection suffers from quadratic computational complexity with context length and degraded performance in complex reasoning tasks. Parametric injection, while reducing inference costs, requires substantial storage overhead and computationally expens…
-
Dynamic and Parametric Retrieval-Augmented GenerationWei-Hang Su, Qing-Yao Ai, Jingtao Zhan et al. · 2025 · Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · cited 17 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a foundational paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, playing an important role in modern information retrieval and knowledge-intensive NLP applications. Standard RAG systems typically adopt a static retrieve-then-generate pipeline and rely on in-context knowledge injection, which can be suboptimal for complex tasks that require multihop reasoning, adaptive information access, and deeper integration of external knowledge. Motivated by these limitations, the research community has moved beyond static retrieval and in-context knowledge injection. Among the emerging directions, this tutorial delves into two ra…
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A SurveyYunfan Gao, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 4,455 times · AI summary available
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) showcase impressive capabilities but encounter challenges like hallucination, outdated knowledge, and non-transparent, untraceable reasoning processes. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising solution by incorporating knowledge from external databases. This enhances the accuracy and credibility of the generation, particularly for knowledge-intensive tasks, and allows for continuous knowledge updates and integration of domain-specific information. RAG synergistically merges LLMs' intrinsic knowledge with the vast, dynamic repositories of external databases. This comprehensive review paper offers a detailed examination of the progression of …
-
Towards Adaptive and Retriever-friendly Retrieval-augmented Generation via Reinforcement LearningYubo Fang, Hai-Tao Yu, Hideo Joho et al. · 2026 · International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as an effective paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, delivering substantial performance gains without costly parameter updates, particularly in low-resource settings. However, existing RAG systems still face several open challenges. Many approaches rely on static or heuristic retrieval strategies, limiting their ability to adapt retrieval strategies to different tasks with different reasoning requirements. Some methods build RAG systems based on independently optimized components, making joint optimization across all components infeasible. Moreover, empirical evidence shows that stronger retrievers do no…
Prior work it builds on
-
In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language ModelsOri Ram, Yoav Levine, Itay Dalmedigos et al. · 2023 · Computation and Language · cited 1,193 times · AI summary available
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Language Modeling (RALM) methods, that condition a language model (LM) on relevant documents from a grounding corpus during generation, have been shown to significantly improve language modeling while also providing a natural source attribution mechanism. Existing RALM approaches focus on modifying the LM architecture in order to facilitate the incorporation of external information, significantly complicating deployment. This paper proposes an under-explored alternative, which we dub In-Context RALM: leaving the LM architecture unchanged and prepending grounding documents to the input. We show that in-context RALM which uses off-the-shelf general purpose retrievers provid…
-
Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context GeneratorsWenhao Yu, Dan Iter, Shuohang Wang et al. · 2022 · Computation and Language · cited 461 times · AI summary available
Abstract
Knowledge-intensive tasks, such as open-domain question answering (QA), require access to a large amount of world or domain knowledge. A common approach for knowledge-intensive tasks is to employ a retrieve-then-read pipeline that first retrieves a handful of relevant contextual documents from an external corpus such as Wikipedia and then predicts an answer conditioned on the retrieved documents. In this paper, we present a novel perspective for solving knowledge-intensive tasks by replacing document retrievers with large language model generators. We call our method generate-then-read (GenRead), which first prompts a large language model to generate contextutal documents based on a given qu…
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus et al. · 2020 · Computation and Language · cited 20,707 times · AI summary available
Abstract
Large pre-trained language models have been shown to store factual knowledge in their parameters, and achieve state-of-the-art results when fine-tuned on downstream NLP tasks. However, their ability to access and precisely manipulate knowledge is still limited, and hence on knowledge-intensive tasks, their performance lags behind task-specific architectures. Additionally, providing provenance for their decisions and updating their world knowledge remain open research problems. Pre-trained models with a differentiable access mechanism to explicit non-parametric memory can overcome this issue, but have so far been only investigated for extractive downstream tasks. We explore a general-purpose …
-
Recitation-Augmented Language ModelsZhiqing Sun, Xue-Zhi Wang, Yi Tay et al. · 2022 · International Conference on Learning Representations · cited 92 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
We propose a new paradigm to help Large Language Models (LLMs) generate more accurate factual knowledge without retrieving from an external corpus, called RECITation-augmented gEneration (RECITE). Different from retrieval-augmented language models that retrieve relevant documents before generating the outputs, given an input, RECITE first recites one or several relevant passages from LLMs' own memory via sampling, and then produces the final answers. We show that RECITE is a powerful paradigm for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Specifically, we show that by utilizing recitation as the intermediate step, a recite-and-answer scheme can achieve new state-of-the-art performance in various closed-…
-
Generation-Augmented Retrieval for Open-Domain Question AnsweringYuning Mao, Peng-Cheng He, Xiao-Dong Liu et al. · 2020 · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · cited 335 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
We propose Generation-Augmented Retrieval (GAR) for answering open-domain questions, which augments a query through text generation of heuristically discovered relevant contexts without external resources as supervision. We demonstrate that the generated contexts substantially enrich the semantics of the queries and GAR with sparse representations (BM25) achieves comparable or better performance than state-of-the-art dense retrieval methods such as DPR. We show that generating diverse contexts for a query is beneficial as fusing their results consistently yields better retrieval accuracy. Moreover, as sparse and dense representations are often complementary, GAR can be easily combined with D…
Papers that cite it
-
Predictive Prefetching for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationWuyang Zhang, Shi-Chao Pei · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves factual grounding in large language models but suffers from substantial latency due to synchronous retrieval. While recent work explores asynchronous retrieval, existing approaches rely on heuristic coordination between retrieval and generation and assume stable information demands during decoding that often break in complex, multi-domain settings. In this paper, we propose an advanced asynchronous retrieval framework that enables predictive prefetching aligned with evolving information needs. The framework explicitly predicts when retrieval should be triggered and what information should be retrieved using three components, a retrieval predictor…
-
A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language ModelsWen-Qi Fan, Yujuan Ding, Liang-Bo Ning et al. · 2024 · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · cited 1,254 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
As one of the most advanced techniques in AI, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can offer reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, providing huge convenience for numerous tasks. Particularly in the era of AI-Generated Content (AIGC), the powerful capacity of retrieval in providing additional knowledge enables RAG to assist existing generative AI in producing high-quality outputs. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated revolutionary abilities in language understanding and generation, while still facing inherent limitations such as hallucinations and out-of-date internal knowledge. Given the powerful abilities of RAG in providing the latest and helpful auxiliary informa…
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A SurveyPenghao Zhao, Hailin Zhang, Qinhan Yu et al. · 2024 · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · cited 549 times · AI summary available
Abstract
Advancements in model algorithms, the growth of foundational models, and access to high-quality datasets have propelled the evolution of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC). Despite its notable successes, AIGC still faces hurdles such as updating knowledge, handling long-tail data, mitigating data leakage, and managing high training and inference costs. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently emerged as a paradigm to address such challenges. In particular, RAG introduces the information retrieval process, which enhances the generation process by retrieving relevant objects from available data stores, leading to higher accuracy and better robustness. In this paper, we c…
-
Retrieval‐Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: Evolution, Architectures, Applications, and Challenges (2020–2025)Arman Rasool Faridi, Faraz Masood, Keshvi et al. · 2026 · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · cited 1 time · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) generate fluent text but remain vulnerable to hallucinations, outdated knowledge, weak provenance, and costly model updates in knowledge‐intensive settings. Retrieval‐augmented generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by grounding generation in external evidence retrieved at inference time. This Advanced Review presents a PRISMA‐guided synthesis of 91 studies published between January 2020 and December 2025. It traces the evolution of RAG from early retrieve‐then‐generate pipelines to a broader design space that includes sparse, dense, and hybrid retrieval; multi‐stage reranking; evidence fusion; retrieval‐aware pre‐training; non‐parametric memory; iterative …
-
Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for MedicineGuangzhi Xiong, Qiao Jin, Zhiyong Lu et al. · 2024 · Computation and Language · cited 373 times · AI summary available
Abstract
While large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on a wide range of medical question answering (QA) tasks, they still face challenges with hallucinations and outdated knowledge. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a promising solution and has been widely adopted. However, a RAG system can involve multiple flexible components, and there is a lack of best practices regarding the optimal RAG setting for various medical purposes. To systematically evaluate such systems, we propose the Medical Information Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation (MIRAGE), a first-of-its-kind benchmark including 7,663 questions from five medical QA datasets. Using MIRAGE, we condu…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
Updated on 6 November 2026.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.