AI-Augmented Surveys: Leveraging Large Language Models and Surveys for Opinion Prediction

AI-generated keywords: AI-Augmented Surveys Large Language Models Opinion Prediction Social Sciences Methodological Framework

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Junsol Kim and Byungkyu Lee explore the intersection of large language models (LLMs) and social surveys to enhance research practices in the social sciences.
  • They introduce a novel methodological framework that combines LLMs with survey data to predict individual responses accurately.
  • The framework involves personalizing LLMs by analyzing survey questions, inferring latent beliefs, and considering temporal contexts across survey periods.
  • Kim and Lee demonstrate the effectiveness of fine-tuning LLMs, specifically the Alpaca-7b model, in predicting individual responses to missing survey questions using data from the General Social Survey spanning from 1972 to 2021.
  • The refined model's capabilities enable researchers to fill in missing trends with high confidence and identify pivotal moments when public attitudes shift.
  • The authors address practical constraints, concerns regarding socio-demographic representation, and ethical considerations related to individual autonomy and privacy when utilizing LLMs for opinion prediction.
  • This study showcases how LLMs and surveys can complement each other's strengths in advancing social science research practices.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Junsol Kim, Byungkyu Lee

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) that produce human-like responses have begun to revolutionize research practices in the social sciences. This paper shows how we can integrate LLMs and social surveys to accurately predict individual responses to survey questions that were not asked before. We develop a novel methodological framework to personalize LLMs by considering the meaning of survey questions derived from their text, the latent beliefs of individuals inferred from their response patterns, and the temporal contexts across different survey periods through fine-tuning LLMs with survey data. Using the General Social Survey from 1972 to 2021, we show that the fine-tuned model based on Alpaca-7b can predict individual responses to survey questions that are partially missing as well as entirely missing. The remarkable prediction capabilities allow us to fill in missing trends with high confidence and pinpoint when public attitudes changed, such as the rising support for same-sex marriage. We discuss practical constraints, socio-demographic representation, and ethical concerns regarding individual autonomy and privacy when using LLMs for opinion prediction. This study demonstrates that LLMs and surveys can mutually enhance each other's capabilities: LLMs broaden survey potential, while surveys improve the alignment of LLMs.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.09620v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "AI-Augmented Surveys: Leveraging Large Language Models and Surveys for Opinion Prediction," authors Junsol Kim and Byungkyu Lee explore the intersection of large language models (LLMs) and social surveys to enhance research practices in the social sciences. They introduce a novel methodological framework that combines LLMs with survey data to accurately predict individual responses to survey questions that were previously unasked. This framework involves personalizing LLMs by analyzing the textual meaning of survey questions, inferring individuals' latent beliefs from response patterns, and considering temporal contexts across various survey periods. Through their study utilizing data from the General Social Survey spanning from 1972 to 2021, Kim and Lee demonstrate the effectiveness of fine-tuning LLMs, specifically the Alpaca-7b model, in predicting individual responses to both partially missing and entirely missing survey questions. The refined model's remarkable prediction capabilities enable researchers to fill in missing trends with high confidence and identify pivotal moments when public attitudes shift, such as the increasing support for same-sex marriage. Furthermore, the authors address practical constraints, concerns regarding socio-demographic representation, and ethical considerations related to individual autonomy and privacy when utilizing LLMs for opinion prediction. They emphasize that this study showcases how LLMs and surveys can complement each other's strengths: while LLMs expand survey potential by providing human-like responses, surveys contribute to improving the alignment of LLM predictions with real-world data. Overall, this research highlights the promising synergy between advanced language models and traditional survey methodologies in advancing social science research practices.
Created on 26 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.