TrueTeacher: Learning Factual Consistency Evaluation with Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Factual Consistency Natural Language Inference Generative Summarization TrueTeacher Synthetic Data

AI-generated Key Points

  • Generative summarization models often produce summaries that are factually inconsistent with their input documents.
  • Natural Language Inference (NLI) models are commonly used to evaluate factual consistency, but have limited success due to the lack of entailment phenomena in NLI datasets.
  • Previous work improved NLI models with synthetic training data generated by perturbing human-written summaries, but this approach has limitations in coverage and style differences from real model-generated summaries.
  • Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising results in directly evaluating generative tasks such as factual consistency in summarization, but they are too computationally expensive for practical use.
  • TrueTeacher is introduced as a method for generating synthetic data by annotating diverse model-generated summaries using a LLM.
  • TrueTeacher does not rely on human-written summaries and is multilingual by nature.
  • Experiments on the TRUE benchmark show that a student model trained using TrueTeacher data substantially outperforms both state-of-the-art models with similar capacity and the LLM teacher.
  • A systematic study demonstrates TrueTeacher's superiority and robustness to domain-shift compared to existing synthetic data generation methods.
  • The method also generalizes to multilingual scenarios using the mFACE dataset.
  • Finally, a large-scale synthetic dataset with 1.4M examples generated using TrueTeacher is released, highlighting the usefulness of this method for improving factual consistency evaluation in summarization models.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Zorik Gekhman, Jonathan Herzig, Roee Aharoni, Chen Elkind, Idan Szpektor

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Factual consistency evaluation is often conducted using Natural Language Inference (NLI) models, yet these models exhibit limited success in evaluating summaries. Previous work improved such models with synthetic training data. However, the data is typically based on perturbed human-written summaries, which often differ in their characteristics from real model-generated summaries and have limited coverage of possible factual errors. Alternatively, large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promising results in directly evaluating generative tasks, but are too computationally expensive for practical use. Motivated by these limitations, we introduce TrueTeacher, a method for generating synthetic data by annotating diverse model-generated summaries using a LLM. Unlike prior work, TrueTeacher does not rely on human-written summaries, and is multilingual by nature. Experiments on the TRUE benchmark show that a student model trained using our data, substantially outperforms both the state-of-the-art model with similar capacity, and the LLM teacher. In a systematic study, we compare TrueTeacher to existing synthetic data generation methods and demonstrate its superiority and robustness to domain-shift. Using the the mFACE dataset, we also show that our method generalizes to multilingual scenarios. Finally, we release a large-scale synthetic dataset with 1.4M examples generated using TrueTeacher.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.11171v1

Generative summarization models often generate summaries that are factually inconsistent with their input documents. To evaluate factual consistency, Natural Language Inference (NLI) models are commonly used but have limited success due to the lack of entailment phenomena in NLI datasets. Previous work improved NLI models with synthetic training data generated by perturbing human-written summaries, but this approach has limitations in coverage and style differences from real model-generated summaries. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising results in directly evaluating generative tasks such as factual consistency in summarization; however, they are too computationally expensive for practical use. To address these limitations, TrueTeacher is introduced as a method for generating synthetic data by annotating diverse model-generated summaries using a LLM. Unlike prior work, TrueTeacher does not rely on human-written summaries and is multilingual by nature. Experiments on the TRUE benchmark show that a student model trained using TrueTeacher data substantially outperforms both state-of-the-art models with similar capacity and the LLM teacher. A systematic study demonstrates TrueTeacher's superiority and robustness to domain-shift compared to existing synthetic data generation methods. The method also generalizes to multilingual scenarios using the mFACE dataset. Finally, a large-scale synthetic dataset with 1.4M examples generated using TrueTeacher is released, highlighting the usefulness of this method for improving factual consistency evaluation in summarization models.
Created on 19 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.