Table Meets LLM: Can Large Language Models Understand Structured Table Data? A Benchmark and Empirical Study

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language

AI-generated Key Points

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as few-shot reasoners in Natural Language (NL)-related tasks
Lack of comprehensive studies on how well LLMs comprehend structured data, particularly tables
Benchmark designed to evaluate structural understanding capabilities (SUC) of LLMs through seven tasks with unique challenges
Performance of LLMs varied based on input choices such as table input format, content order, role prompting, and partition marks
Proposal of "self-augmentation" for effective structural prompting by utilizing internal knowledge of LLMs for critical value/range identification
Importance of in-context learning for understanding structural information within tables highlighted by significant drop in system performance in zero-shot setting compared to one-shot setting when using HTML format for all tasks
Placing external information ahead of tables resulted in improved performance across all tasks by providing better generalization and context regarding the structural information
Investigation into most effective input designs for enabling LLMs to understand tables due to chaotic landscape of varied input designs used in previous work
Strategic input design choices coupled with self-augmented prompting methods can significantly enhance LLM performance on tabular tasks

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yuan Sui, Mengyu Zhou, Mingjie Zhou, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang

arXiv: 2305.13062v4 - DOI (cs.CL)

This paper has been accepted as a full paper at WSDM 2024. The code will be released at https://github.com/microsoft/TableProvider

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are becoming attractive as few-shot reasoners to solve Natural Language (NL)-related tasks. However, there is still much to learn about how well LLMs understand structured data, such as tables. Although tables can be used as input to LLMs with serialization, there is a lack of comprehensive studies that examine whether LLMs can truly comprehend such data. In this paper, we try to understand this by designing a benchmark to evaluate the structural understanding capabilities (SUC) of LLMs. The benchmark we create includes seven tasks, each with its own unique challenges, e.g., cell lookup, row retrieval, and size detection. We perform a series of evaluations on GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. We find that performance varied depending on several input choices, including table input format, content order, role prompting, and partition marks. Drawing from the insights gained through the benchmark evaluations, we propose \textit{self-augmentation} for effective structural prompting, such as critical value / range identification using internal knowledge of LLMs. When combined with carefully chosen input choices, these structural prompting methods lead to promising improvements in LLM performance on a variety of tabular tasks, e.g., TabFact($\uparrow2.31\%$), HybridQA($\uparrow2.13\%$), SQA($\uparrow2.72\%$), Feverous($\uparrow0.84\%$), and ToTTo($\uparrow5.68\%$). We believe that our open source benchmark and proposed prompting methods can serve as a simple yet generic selection for future research.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 May. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.13062v4

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

, , , , In the realm of Natural Language (NL)-related tasks, Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being utilized as few-shot reasoners. However, there is still much to be understood about how well LLMs comprehend structured data, particularly tables. While tables can be inputted into LLMs through serialization, there is a lack of comprehensive studies examining whether LLMs truly grasp such data. To address this gap, a benchmark was designed to evaluate the structural understanding capabilities (SUC) of LLMs. This benchmark consists of seven tasks with unique challenges such as cell lookup, row retrieval, and size detection. Through evaluations on GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, it was found that the performance of LLMs varied based on several input choices including table input format, content order, role prompting, and partition marks. Insights gained from these evaluations led to the proposal of "self-augmentation" for effective structural prompting by utilizing internal knowledge of LLMs for critical value/range identification. When combined with carefully chosen input choices, these structural prompting methods showed promising improvements in LLM performance across various tabular tasks. Further analysis revealed that system performance significantly dropped in a zero-shot setting compared to a one-shot setting when using HTML format for all tasks. This highlights the importance of in-context learning for understanding structural information within tables. Additionally, placing external information ahead of tables resulted in improved performance across all tasks by providing better generalization and context regarding the structural information. The chaotic landscape of varied input designs used in previous work necessitated an investigation into the most effective input designs for enabling LLMs to understand tables. The proposed SUC benchmark aimed to compare various input designs and assess LLMs' structural understanding capabilities through specific tasks focusing on each capability. By conducting experiments with different prompt variants and offering pragmatic guidance on leveraging LLMs for structured data comprehension, this study contributes valuable insights for future research in this field. Overall, the findings suggest that strategic input design choices coupled with self-augmented prompting methods can enhance LLM performance on tabular tasks significantly. This work not only sheds light on improving LLM comprehension of structured data but also provides a foundation for further exploration and development in this area.

- Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as few-shot reasoners in Natural Language (NL)-related tasks
- Lack of comprehensive studies on how well LLMs comprehend structured data, particularly tables
- Benchmark designed to evaluate structural understanding capabilities (SUC) of LLMs through seven tasks with unique challenges
- Performance of LLMs varied based on input choices such as table input format, content order, role prompting, and partition marks
- Proposal of "self-augmentation" for effective structural prompting by utilizing internal knowledge of LLMs for critical value/range identification
- Importance of in-context learning for understanding structural information within tables highlighted by significant drop in system performance in zero-shot setting compared to one-shot setting when using HTML format for all tasks
- Placing external information ahead of tables resulted in improved performance across all tasks by providing better generalization and context regarding the structural information
- Investigation into most effective input designs for enabling LLMs to understand tables due to chaotic landscape of varied input designs used in previous work
- Strategic input design choices coupled with self-augmented prompting methods can significantly enhance LLM performance on tabular tasks

SummaryLarge language models (LLMs) are like smart helpers that can quickly understand and solve problems using language. Some people are studying how well these LLMs can understand tables of information, which are like organized lists of data. A special test was created to see how good LLMs are at understanding different types of table challenges. The performance of LLMs can change depending on how the information is presented in the tables. One idea to help LLMs get better at understanding tables is to let them use their own knowledge to figure out important details. Definitions- Large language models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that can process and understand human languages. - Structured data: Information that is organized in a specific way for easier analysis and interpretation. - Benchmark: A standard or test used to evaluate the performance or capabilities of something. - Prompting: Providing cues or hints to guide someone's actions or responses. - Generalization: Applying knowledge or skills from one situation to another similar situation.

Introduction Natural Language (NL)-related tasks have seen a significant shift towards the use of large language models (LLMs) as few-shot reasoners. These powerful models have shown impressive performance in various NL tasks, but their ability to comprehend structured data, particularly tables, is still not fully understood. While tables can be inputted into LLMs through serialization, there is a lack of comprehensive studies examining whether LLMs truly grasp such data. To address this gap, a research paper titled "Structural Understanding Capabilities of Large Language Models" proposes a benchmark to evaluate the structural understanding capabilities (SUC) of LLMs when dealing with tabular data. This article will provide a detailed overview and analysis of this research paper. Background The use of LLMs for NL-related tasks has gained popularity due to their ability to perform well on few-shot reasoning tasks. However, there is limited research on how well these models understand structured data such as tables. Tables are an essential form of structured data that contains valuable information and are commonly used in various fields such as finance, healthcare, and education. Previous work has explored different methods for inputting tables into LLMs but lacked consistency in design choices. This led to the need for a benchmark that compares various input designs and assesses LLMs' structural understanding capabilities through specific tasks focusing on each capability. Proposed Benchmark The SUC benchmark consists of seven tasks designed to evaluate different aspects of structural understanding capabilities in LLMs. These include cell lookup, row retrieval, size detection, column identification/selection, table completion/filling missing values, sorting rows/columns based on specific criteria or conditions and basic arithmetic operations within cells. Evaluation Results Through evaluations on GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 using different input formats and prompting methods across all seven tasks in the SUC benchmark revealed interesting insights about the performance variations among these models. One of the key findings was that the performance of LLMs varied based on several input choices, including table input format, content order, role prompting, and partition marks. For example, using HTML format for all tasks resulted in a significant drop in performance in a zero-shot setting compared to a one-shot setting. This highlights the importance of in-context learning for understanding structural information within tables. Another interesting finding was that placing external information ahead of tables resulted in improved performance across all tasks by providing better generalization and context regarding the structural information. This suggests that strategic input design choices can significantly impact LLMs' ability to comprehend structured data. Self-Augmentation The research paper also proposes "self-augmentation" as an effective method for structural prompting by utilizing internal knowledge of LLMs for critical value/range identification. When combined with carefully chosen input choices, these self-augmented prompting methods showed promising improvements in LLM performance across various tabular tasks. Conclusion In conclusion, this research paper provides valuable insights into improving LLM comprehension of structured data through strategic input design choices and self-augmented prompting methods. The proposed SUC benchmark offers a standardized approach to evaluate LLMs' structural understanding capabilities and serves as a foundation for further exploration and development in this area. Future work could focus on expanding the benchmark to include more complex tabular tasks or exploring other ways to improve LLMs' comprehension of structured data. Overall, this study contributes towards bridging the gap between NL-related tasks and structured data comprehension using large language models.

Created on 07 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

71.4%

Large Language Models on Tabular Data -- A Survey

cs.CL

61.2%

Better Synthetic Data by Retrieving and Transforming Existing Datasets

cs.CL

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.