Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.14627v2

Large language models (LLMs) have become popular tools for information seeking. However, they often generate outputs that contain false or misleading information. To address this issue, the authors of this paper aim to enable LLMs to generate text with citations. This would improve the accuracy and verifiability of their generated content. Existing approaches in this area rely heavily on commercial search engines and human evaluation. This makes it difficult to reproduce and compare different modeling techniques. To overcome these challenges, the authors propose ALCE (Automatic LLMs' Citation Evaluation). It is the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs' citation generation capabilities. ALCE includes a diverse set of questions and retrieval corpora. This requires the development of end-to-end systems that can retrieve supporting evidence and generate answers with citations. The authors also introduce automatic metrics to evaluate fluency, correctness, and citation quality. These demonstrate a strong correlation with human judgments. The experiments conducted using state-of-the-art LLMs and novel prompting strategies reveal that current systems have significant room for improvement. For instance, even the best models lack complete citation support 50% of the time on the ELI5 dataset. The authors' analysis suggests several promising directions for future research including enhancing retrievers, advancing long-context LLMs, and improving the synthesis of information from multiple sources. Overall, this paper presents a comprehensive approach to addressing hallucination in LLM-generated text by enabling them to generate text with citations. The proposed benchmark ALCE provides a standardized evaluation framework for comparing different modeling approaches in terms of fluency, correctness, and citation quality. The findings highlight areas where current systems fall short and offer insights into potential avenues for further improvement in generating accurate and verifiable information using LLMs.

• - Large language models (LLMs) are popular tools for information seeking
• - LLMs often generate outputs with false or misleading information
• - Authors aim to enable LLMs to generate text with citations to improve accuracy and verifiability
• - Existing approaches rely on commercial search engines and human evaluation, making reproducibility and comparison difficult
• - Authors propose ALCE (Automatic LLMs' Citation Evaluation) as a benchmark for evaluating LLMs' citation generation capabilities
• - ALCE includes diverse questions and retrieval corpora, requiring end-to-end systems for evidence retrieval and citation generation
• - Automatic metrics are introduced to evaluate fluency, correctness, and citation quality, showing correlation with human judgments
• - Experiments reveal current systems have room for improvement, even the best models lack complete citation support 50% of the time on ELI5 dataset
• - Promising directions for future research include enhancing retrievers, advancing long-context LLMs, and improving synthesis of information from multiple sources
• - Paper presents comprehensive approach to addressing hallucination in LLM-generated text by enabling them to generate text with citations
• - Proposed benchmark ALCE provides standardized evaluation framework for comparing different modeling approaches in terms of fluency, correctness, and citation quality

Large language models (LLMs) are tools that people use to find information. Sometimes, these tools give out wrong or misleading information. The authors want to make LLMs better by making them include citations, which are references to where the information comes from. Right now, it is hard to compare different LLMs because they use different methods and human evaluation. The authors suggest a new way called ALCE to test how good LLMs are at including citations. They made questions and examples for the LLMs to find information and make citations. They also made automatic tests to see if the LLMs' answers are correct and have good citations. The experiments showed that even the best models can do better in including citations in their answers. In the future, researchers can work on improving how the LLMs find information, how they understand long pieces of text, and how they combine information from different sources. This paper gives a good plan for making sure LLMs give accurate information with proper citations."

Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in recent years as powerful tools for information seeking. These models, such as GPT-3 and BERT, are trained on vast amounts of text data and can generate human-like responses to prompts or questions. However, one major issue with LLMs is that they often produce outputs that contain false or misleading information, also known as "hallucinations." To address this problem, the authors of the research paper "Generating Text with Citations: Challenges and Promising Directions" propose a new approach to enable LLMs to generate text with citations. The goal of this approach is to improve the accuracy and verifiability of LLM-generated content by incorporating citations into their outputs. This would allow readers to easily fact-check the information presented by LLMs and verify its credibility. The authors recognize that existing approaches in this area heavily rely on commercial search engines and manual evaluation, making it difficult to reproduce and compare different modeling techniques. Therefore, they introduce ALCE (Automatic LLMs' Citation Evaluation), which is the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs' citation generation capabilities. ALCE includes a diverse set of questions and retrieval corpora, requiring the development of end-to-end systems that can retrieve supporting evidence from external sources and generate answers with proper citations. This not only evaluates the ability of LLMs to incorporate citations but also tests their overall performance in generating accurate responses based on multiple sources. To evaluate fluency, correctness, and citation quality in generated text with citations, the authors introduce automatic metrics that demonstrate a strong correlation with human judgments. These metrics provide a standardized framework for comparing different modeling approaches in terms of their ability to produce accurate and verifiable information. The experiments conducted using state-of-the-art LLMs reveal significant room for improvement in current systems. For example, even the best models lack complete citation support 50% of the time on the ELI5 dataset. This highlights the need for further research and improvement in LLMs' citation generation capabilities. The authors' analysis also suggests several promising directions for future research, including enhancing retrievers to improve the quality of supporting evidence retrieved from external sources, advancing long-context LLMs to better understand and synthesize information from multiple sources, and improving the overall synthesis of information in generated text with citations. In conclusion, this paper presents a comprehensive approach to addressing hallucination in LLM-generated text by enabling them to generate text with citations. The proposed benchmark ALCE provides a standardized evaluation framework for comparing different modeling approaches in terms of fluency, correctness, and citation quality. The findings highlight areas where current systems fall short and offer insights into potential avenues for further improvement in generating accurate and verifiable information using LLMs. With continued research and development, this approach has the potential to greatly enhance the reliability of information generated by large language models.