Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2305.16546v1

The study focuses on comparing two deep learning models, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM), for short-term forecasting of univariate electric consumption time series. The objective is to assess the robustness of these models by using four different datasets with varying contexts and scales. The datasets include the power consumption of a household in France, a university building in Santarém, Brazil, the Tétouan city zones in Morocco, and the aggregated electric demand in Singapore. To evaluate the performance of the models, several metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and R-squared (R2) were calculated using a time series cross-validation scheme. Additionally, Friedman's test was applied to normalized RMSE results to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between LSTM and BLSTM. The results show that BLSTM outperforms LSTM with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0455). This indicates that bidirectional weight updating significantly improves the performance of LSTM when dealing with different scales of electric power consumption. Furthermore, this study provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning models for electric consumption prediction and highlights the effectiveness of BLSTM compared to LSTM. It also emphasizes the importance of considering bidirectional weight updating in forecasting tasks related to energy efficiency and market dynamics.

• - The study compares LSTM and BLSTM models for short-term forecasting of electric consumption time series.
• - Four different datasets with varying contexts and scales were used, including household power consumption in France, a university building in Brazil, city zones in Morocco, and aggregated electric demand in Singapore.
• - Performance evaluation metrics such as RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and R2 were calculated using time series cross-validation scheme.
• - Friedman's test was applied to normalized RMSE results to determine statistical significance between LSTM and BLSTM.
• - Results show that BLSTM outperforms LSTM with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0455).
• - Bidirectional weight updating significantly improves the performance of LSTM when dealing with different scales of electric power consumption.
• - The study provides insights into the application of deep learning models for electric consumption prediction.
• - BLSTM is more effective compared to LSTM in this context.
• - Bidirectional weight updating is important for forecasting tasks related to energy efficiency and market dynamics.

The study looked at two different models, LSTM and BLSTM, to predict how much electricity people will use in the future. They used four different sets of data from different places to test the models. They used some numbers to see how well the models worked, like RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and R2. They also did a special test called Friedman's test to compare the two models. The results showed that BLSTM was better than LSTM at predicting electricity use. This is important because it can help us save energy and understand how the market works." Definitions- LSTM: A type of model used for predicting things based on patterns in data. - BLSTM: Another type of model that is similar to LSTM but can look at data in both directions. - Electric consumption: How much electricity people use. - Time series: Data that shows how something changes over time. - Performance evaluation metrics: Numbers used to measure how well something works. - Statistical significance: A way to tell if something is really true or just by chance. - Bidirectional weight updating: A way of making a model better by adjusting its settings based on data from both past and future.

Comparing Deep Learning Models for Short-Term Forecasting of Univariate Electric Consumption Time Series

Deep learning models have become increasingly popular in recent years due to their ability to accurately predict future events and trends. In this article, we will discuss a research paper that compares two deep learning models, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM), for short-term forecasting of univariate electric consumption time series. The objective is to assess the robustness of these models by using four different datasets with varying contexts and scales.

Background

Electricity consumption prediction is an important task in many areas such as energy efficiency, market dynamics, and smart grid management. Accurate predictions are essential for efficient resource allocation and cost savings. Traditional methods such as linear regression or autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) have been used for electricity consumption forecasting but they often lack accuracy when dealing with complex data patterns or nonlinear relationships between variables. Deep learning models offer more accurate results by taking into account multiple factors at once and can be applied to various types of problems including time series forecasting.

Methodology

In this study, the researchers compared two deep learning models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM). These models were evaluated on four different datasets with varying contexts and scales: the power consumption of a household in France, a university building in Santarém, Brazil, the Tétouan city zones in Morocco, and the aggregated electric demand in Singapore. To evaluate the performance of the models several metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and R-squared (R2) were calculated using a time series cross-validation scheme. Additionally, Friedman's test was applied to normalized RMSE results to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between LSTM and BLSTM.

Results

The results show that BLSTM outperforms LSTM with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0455). This indicates that bidirectional weight updating significantly improves the performance of LSTM when dealing with different scales of electric power consumption. Furthermore, this study provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning models for electric consumption prediction and highlights the effectiveness of BLSTM compared to L