Understanding the Social Context of Eating with Multimodal Smartphone Sensing: The Role of Country Diversity

AI-generated keywords: Social Context Eating Behavior Smartphone Sensing Country Differences Machine Learning

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Social context of eating is crucial in promoting healthy eating behaviors
  • Smartphone sensing data can provide valuable insights into eating behavior through mobile food diaries and health applications
  • Research on the social context of eating with smartphone sensor data is limited, especially regarding country differences
  • A study was conducted using a smartphone sensing dataset from eight countries to investigate the country diversity that emerges from smartphone sensors during eating events for different social contexts (alone or with others)
  • Some smartphone usage features during eating events were similar across countries, while others exhibited unique behaviors in each country
  • Machine learning models were developed to understand how user and country-specific factors impact social context inference in mobile food diaries and health sensing systems
  • The hybrid approach achieved AUC scores up to 0.75 with XGBoost models
  • Findings emphasize the importance of considering country differences when building and deploying machine learning models to minimize biases and improve generalization across different populations.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Nathan Kammoun, Lakmal Meegahapola, Daniel Gatica-Perez

Abstract: Understanding the social context of eating is crucial for promoting healthy eating behaviors by providing timely interventions. Multimodal smartphone sensing data has the potential to provide valuable insights into eating behavior, particularly in mobile food diaries and mobile health applications. However, research on the social context of eating with smartphone sensor data is limited, despite extensive study in nutrition and behavioral science. Moreover, the impact of country differences on the social context of eating, as measured by multimodal phone sensor data and self-reports, remains under-explored. To address this research gap, we present a study using a smartphone sensing dataset from eight countries (China, Denmark, India, Italy, Mexico, Mongolia, Paraguay, and the UK). Our study focuses on a set of approximately 24K self-reports on eating events provided by 678 college students to investigate the country diversity that emerges from smartphone sensors during eating events for different social contexts (alone or with others). Our analysis revealed that while some smartphone usage features during eating events were similar across countries, others exhibited unique behaviors in each country. We further studied how user and country-specific factors impact social context inference by developing machine learning models with population-level (non-personalized) and hybrid (partially personalized) experimental setups. We showed that models based on the hybrid approach achieve AUC scores up to 0.75 with XGBoost models. These findings have implications for future research on mobile food diaries and mobile health sensing systems, emphasizing the importance of considering country differences in building and deploying machine learning models to minimize biases and improve generalization across different populations.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.00709v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The social context of eating plays a crucial role in promoting healthy eating behaviors, and smartphone sensing data can provide valuable insights into eating behavior through mobile food diaries and health applications. However, research on the social context of eating with smartphone sensor data is limited, especially regarding country differences. To address this gap, a study was conducted using a smartphone sensing dataset from eight countries (China, Denmark, India, Italy, Mexico, Mongolia, Paraguay, and the UK) to investigate the country diversity that emerges from smartphone sensors during eating events for different social contexts (alone or with others). The study focused on approximately 24K self-reports on eating events provided by 678 college students. The analysis revealed that while some smartphone usage features during eating events were similar across countries, others exhibited unique behaviors in each country. To further understand how user and country-specific factors impact social context inference in mobile food diaries and health sensing systems, machine learning models were developed with population-level (non-personalized) and hybrid (partially personalized) experimental setups. The hybrid approach achieved AUC scores up to 0.75 with XGBoost models. These findings have implications for future research on mobile food diaries and health sensing systems as they emphasize the importance of considering country differences when building and deploying machine learning models to minimize biases and improve generalization across different populations. Overall, this study highlights the importance of understanding the social context of eating through smartphone sensing data to promote healthy eating behaviors effectively. It also emphasizes the need to consider country differences when developing machine learning models for mobile food diaries and health sensing systems to ensure their effectiveness across diverse populations.
Created on 05 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.