Natural Language Commanding via Program Synthesis

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language Commanding Program Synthesis Semantic Interpreter Office Domain Specific Language (ODSL) Large Language Models (LLMs)

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors: Apurva Gandhi, Thong Q. Nguyen, Huitian Jiao, Robert Steen, Ameya Bhatawdekar
  • Introduction of Semantic Interpreter: AI system enhancing productivity software like Microsoft Office
  • Approach: Analysis-Retrieval prompt construction with large language models (LLMs) for program synthesis
  • Process: Translating user natural language utterances into ODSL programs for application APIs execution
  • Focus: Exploring Semantic Interpreter capabilities in Microsoft PowerPoint
  • Goal: Streamlining and enhancing user interactions with productivity software through intuitive natural language commands
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Apurva Gandhi, Thong Q. Nguyen, Huitian Jiao, Robert Steen, Ameya Bhatawdekar

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: We present Semantic Interpreter, a natural language-friendly AI system for productivity software such as Microsoft Office that leverages large language models (LLMs) to execute user intent across application features. While LLMs are excellent at understanding user intent expressed as natural language, they are not sufficient for fulfilling application-specific user intent that requires more than text-to-text transformations. We therefore introduce the Office Domain Specific Language (ODSL), a concise, high-level language specialized for performing actions in and interacting with entities in Office applications. Semantic Interpreter leverages an Analysis-Retrieval prompt construction method with LLMs for program synthesis, translating natural language user utterances to ODSL programs that can be transpiled to application APIs and then executed. We focus our discussion primarily on a research exploration for Microsoft PowerPoint.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.03460v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Natural Language Commanding via Program Synthesis," authors Apurva Gandhi, Thong Q. Nguyen, Huitian Jiao, Robert Steen, and Ameya Bhatawdekar introduce the Semantic Interpreter - an AI system designed to enhance productivity software like Microsoft Office by leveraging large language models (LLMs) to interpret user intent across various application features. The Semantic Interpreter utilizes an Analysis-Retrieval prompt construction approach in conjunction with LLMs for program synthesis. This process involves translating user utterances expressed in natural language into ODSL programs that can be transpiled into application APIs and subsequently executed. The focus of their research primarily centers around exploring the capabilities of Semantic Interpreter within Microsoft PowerPoint. By combining the power of LLMs with a domain-specific language like ODSL, the authors aim to streamline and enhance user interactions with productivity software by enabling seamless execution of complex tasks through intuitive natural language commands. Through their innovative approach, they pave the way for more efficient and user-friendly AI systems in the realm of productivity software.
Created on 09 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.