A Rapid Review of Responsible AI frameworks: How to guide the development of ethical AI
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has raised concerns about ethical principles for its implementation and use.
- Researchers led by Vita Santa Barletta conducted a rapid review of several frameworks providing principles, guidelines, and tools to help practitioners develop and deploy Responsible AI (RAI) applications.
- Most of these frameworks focus only on the Requirements Elicitation phase of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), leaving other phases uncovered.
- Very few frameworks offer supporting tools for practitioners, with most being provided by private companies.
- There is no comprehensive framework encompassing all RAI principles and SDLC phases that can be navigated by users with different skill sets and goals.
- Future work should focus on developing a comprehensive framework that supports both technical and non-technical stakeholders in implementing real-world projects.
- Collaboration between industry, academia, policymakers, and other stakeholders is important in addressing these issues.
- Clear ethical guidelines for AI development are crucial to ensure that it benefits society as a whole while minimizing potential harm.
Authors: Vita Santa Barletta, Danilo Caivano, Domenico Gigante, Azzurra Ragone
Abstract: In the last years, the raise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and its pervasiveness in our lives, has sparked a flourishing debate about the ethical principles that should lead its implementation and use in society. Driven by these concerns, we conduct a rapid review of several frameworks providing principles, guidelines, and/or tools to help practitioners in the development and deployment of Responsible AI (RAI) applications. We map each framework w.r.t. the different Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) phases discovering that most of these frameworks fall just in the Requirements Elicitation phase, leaving the other phases uncovered. Very few of these frameworks offer supporting tools for practitioners, and they are mainly provided by private companies. Our results reveal that there is not a "catching-all" framework supporting both technical and non-technical stakeholders in the implementation of real-world projects. Our findings highlight the lack of a comprehensive framework encompassing all RAI principles and all (SDLC) phases that could be navigated by users with different skill sets and with different goals.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.