Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap

AI-generated keywords: LLMs

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT4 are impressive at generating text
  • LLMs lack factual knowledge and interpretability
  • Knowledge Graphs (KGs) store structured factual knowledge but struggle with generating new facts and representing unseen knowledge
  • Unifying LLMs and KGs is of growing interest to leverage their respective advantages
  • Three general frameworks for unification:
  • 1) KG-enhanced LLMs: Incorporating KGs during pre-training and inference phases of LLMs to enhance understanding and improve inference capabilities.
  • 2) LLM-augmented KGs: Using LLMs to assist with various KG tasks such as embedding, completion, construction, graph-to-text generation, and question answering.
  • 3) Synergized LLMs + KGs: Emphasizing equal roles for both LLMs and KGs to enhance bidirectional reasoning driven by data and knowledge.
  • Existing efforts within these three frameworks are reviewed in the article
  • Future research directions aim to effectively combine the strengths of LLMs and KGs while addressing their individual limitations
  • The goal is to create more powerful models that generate accurate and interpretable text while leveraging rich factual knowledge stored in KGs.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shirui Pan, Linhao Luo, Yufei Wang, Chen Chen, Jiapu Wang, Xindong Wu

29 pages, 25 figures

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and GPT4, are making new waves in the field of natural language processing and artificial intelligence, due to their emergent ability and generalizability. However, LLMs are black-box models, which often fall short of capturing and accessing factual knowledge. In contrast, Knowledge Graphs (KGs), Wikipedia and Huapu for example, are structured knowledge models that explicitly store rich factual knowledge. KGs can enhance LLMs by providing external knowledge for inference and interpretability. Meanwhile, KGs are difficult to construct and evolving by nature, which challenges the existing methods in KGs to generate new facts and represent unseen knowledge. Therefore, it is complementary to unify LLMs and KGs together and simultaneously leverage their advantages. In this article, we present a forward-looking roadmap for the unification of LLMs and KGs. Our roadmap consists of three general frameworks, namely, 1) KG-enhanced LLMs, which incorporate KGs during the pre-training and inference phases of LLMs, or for the purpose of enhancing understanding of the knowledge learned by LLMs; 2) LLM-augmented KGs, that leverage LLMs for different KG tasks such as embedding, completion, construction, graph-to-text generation, and question answering; and 3) Synergized LLMs + KGs, in which LLMs and KGs play equal roles and work in a mutually beneficial way to enhance both LLMs and KGs for bidirectional reasoning driven by both data and knowledge. We review and summarize existing efforts within these three frameworks in our roadmap and pinpoint their future research directions.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.08302v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT4 have gained significant attention in the field of natural language processing and artificial intelligence due to their impressive ability to generate text. However, LLMs are often criticized for their lack of factual knowledge and interpretability. On the other hand, Knowledge Graphs (KGs) such as Wikipedia and Huapu store structured factual knowledge but face challenges in generating new facts and representing unseen knowledge. To address these limitations, there is a growing interest in unifying LLMs and KGs to leverage their respective advantages. This article presents a forward-looking roadmap for this unification, outlining three general frameworks: 1) KG-enhanced LLMs; 2) LLM-augmented KGs; 3) Synergized LLMs + KGs. The first framework involves incorporating KGs during the pre-training and inference phases of LLMs. By integrating external knowledge from KGs, LLMs can enhance their understanding and improve inference capabilities. The second framework uses LLMs to assist with various KG tasks such as embedding, completion, construction, graph-to-text generation, and question answering. By leveraging the power of LLMs, KGs can benefit from improved performance in these tasks. The third framework emphasizes the equal roles played by both LLMs and KGs working together in a mutually beneficial way to enhance each other's capabilities for bidirectional reasoning driven by both data and knowledge. This article reviews existing efforts within these three frameworks and identifies future research directions with the goal of developing methods that effectively combine the strengths of LLMs and KGs while addressing their individual limitations. By unifying these two approaches, researchers aim to create more powerful models that can generate accurate and interpretable text while leveraging rich factual knowledge stored in KGs.
Created on 25 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.