On Hate Scaling Laws For Data-Swamps

AI-generated keywords: Generative AI Scaling Large-Scale Datasets Open-Sourcing Initiatives Ethical AI Practices

AI-generated Key Points

  • Prevailing sentiment in generative AI is to scale model, data, and GPU-farms
  • Gap in understanding the impact of scaling datasets, especially visio-linguistic datasets from CommonCrawl dump
  • LAION-400M project aimed to create open-source variants of opaque datasets and models like CLIP and DALL.E
  • Open-sourcing initiatives are vital for accountability and trustworthy AI by enabling auditing and evaluation
  • Concerns with web-sourced data necessitate continual evaluation and audit for ethical practices
  • Emphasizing scalability over societal equity often aligns with Big Tech's profit-driven objectives at the expense of individual rights and societal impacts
  • Auditing multimodal datasets like LAION-400M presents challenges due to hateful content existing in text and image modalities
  • Poor data quality issues such as duplicates can significantly impact image generation processes at scale
  • Presence of hateful content increased by nearly 12% in larger datasets, exacerbating societal biases and negative stereotypes
  • Ongoing evaluation and audit of large-scale datasets are crucial for ensuring ethical AI practices
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Abeba Birhane, Vinay Prabhu, Sang Han, Vishnu Naresh Boddeti

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: `Scale the model, scale the data, scale the GPU-farms' is the reigning sentiment in the world of generative AI today. While model scaling has been extensively studied, data scaling and its downstream impacts remain under explored. This is especially of critical importance in the context of visio-linguistic datasets whose main source is the World Wide Web, condensed and packaged as the CommonCrawl dump. This large scale data-dump, which is known to have numerous drawbacks, is repeatedly mined and serves as the data-motherlode for large generative models. In this paper, we: 1) investigate the effect of scaling datasets on hateful content through a comparative audit of the LAION-400M and LAION-2B-en, containing 400 million and 2 billion samples respectively, and 2) evaluate the downstream impact of scale on visio-linguistic models trained on these dataset variants by measuring racial bias of the models trained on them using the Chicago Face Dataset (CFD) as a probe. Our results show that 1) the presence of hateful content in datasets, when measured with a Hate Content Rate (HCR) metric on the inferences of the Pysentimiento hate-detection Natural Language Processing (NLP) model, increased by nearly $12\%$ and 2) societal biases and negative stereotypes were also exacerbated with scale on the models we evaluated. As scale increased, the tendency of the model to associate images of human faces with the `human being' class over 7 other offensive classes reduced by half. Furthermore, for the Black female category, the tendency of the model to associate their faces with the `criminal' class doubled, while quintupling for Black male faces. We present a qualitative and historical analysis of the model audit results, reflect on our findings and its implications for dataset curation practice, and close with a summary of our findings and potential future work to be done in this area.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Jun. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.13141v2

In the world of generative AI, the prevailing sentiment is to scale not only the model and data but also the GPU-farms. While model scaling has been extensively studied, there remains a gap in understanding the impact of scaling datasets, especially in visio-linguistic datasets sourced from the CommonCrawl dump on the World Wide Web. This large-scale data dump serves as a crucial resource for training large generative models despite its drawbacks. The LAION-400M project aimed to create open-source variants of opaque datasets like WIT and models like CLIP and DALL.E. Open-sourcing initiatives are vital for accountability and building trustworthy AI by enabling auditing and evaluation. However, concerns arise with web-sourced data, necessitating continual evaluation and audit of large-scale datasets and models for ethical practices. , emphasizing scalability over societal equity or systemic change, often aligns with Big Tech's profit-driven objectives at the expense of individual rights and societal impacts. Recognizing the negative downstream effects of scale underscores the importance of evaluating models and datasets as an intervention mechanism. Auditing multimodal datasets like LAION-400M and LAION-2B-en presents challenges due to hateful content existing in both text and image modalities. Poor data quality issues such as duplicates can arise with scale, significantly impacting image generation processes. The audits focused on comparing LAION-400M containing 400 million samples with LAION-2B-en containing 2 billion samples to evaluate their impact on hateful content and racial bias in visio-linguistic models. The presence of hateful content increased by nearly 12% in larger datasets, exacerbating societal biases and negative stereotypes. As scale increased, model tendencies towards associating images with offensive classes decreased significantly. Overall, this study highlights the need for ongoing evaluation and audit of large-scale datasets to ensure ethical AI practices. The open-sourcing movement plays a crucial role in providing access to datasets for independent auditing and evaluation to address concerns surrounding dataset curation practices effectively.
Created on 22 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.