Building Trust Profiles in Conditionally Automated Driving
AI-generated Key Points
- Trust is crucial for the acceptance and adoption of automated vehicles (AVs)
- Research aims to investigate trust profiles for personalized experiences in AVs
- Study conducted using a driving simulator with three different conditions: control, false alarm, and miss
- Researchers measured drivers' dispositional trust, initial learned trust, dynamic trust, personality traits, and emotions
- Three distinct trust profiles identified: believers, oscillators, and disbelievers
- Validation model achieved impressive F1-score of 0.90 and accuracy of 0.89
- Individual factors influence trust profiles providing valuable insights into persona's perspective
- Understanding these factors can help design personalized in-vehicle trust monitoring systems
- Tailored approaches to monitor and adjust drivers' trust levels based on unique profiles can improve safety and enhance overall experience of automated driving
- Foster greater acceptance and usage of AVs while ensuring safety and security on the roads
Authors: Lilit Avetisyan, Jackie Ayoub, X. Jessie Yang, Feng Zhou
Abstract: Trust is crucial for ensuring the safety, security, and widespread adoption of automated vehicles (AVs), and if trust is lacking, drivers and the public may not be willing to use them. This research seeks to investigate trust profiles in order to create personalized experiences for drivers in AVs. This technique helps in better understanding drivers' dynamic trust from a persona's perspective. The study was conducted in a driving simulator where participants were requested to take over control from automated driving in three conditions that included a control condition, a false alarm condition, and a miss condition with eight takeover requests (TORs) in different scenarios. Drivers' dispositional trust, initial learned trust, dynamic trust, personality, and emotions were measured. We identified three trust profiles (i.e., believers, oscillators, and disbelievers) using a K-means clustering model. In order to validate this model, we built a multinomial logistic regression model based on SHAP explainer that selected the most important features to predict the trust profiles with an F1-score of 0.90 and accuracy of 0.89. We also discussed how different individual factors influenced trust profiles which helped us understand trust dynamics better from a persona's perspective. Our findings have important implications for designing a personalized in-vehicle trust monitoring and calibrating system to adjust drivers' trust levels in order to improve safety and experience in automated driving.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.