Towards Real Smart Apps: Investigating Human-AI Interactions in Smartphone On-Device AI Apps

Authors: Jason Ching Yuen Siu, Jieshan Chen, Yujin Huang, Zhenchang Xing, Chunyang Chen

14 pages, 6 figures
AI-generated keywords: On-device AI Speech translation Interaction design User study Empirical study

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Deep learning techniques have led to on-device AI features in smartphone apps
  • AI features enable advanced tasks like speech translation, attracting users and increasing market competitiveness
  • Designing good interaction for AI features is crucial for usability and understandability
  • Existing guidelines and tools do not adequately address the challenges of AI features
  • The authors conducted an empirical study to explore user-AI interactions in mobile apps
  • They identified 255 distinct AI features and summarized 759 implementations into three primary interaction pattern types
  • A multi-faceted search-enabled gallery was developed based on their findings
  • A user study demonstrated the usefulness and effectiveness of their findings
  • Effective interactions for on-device AI features enhance user experience and make apps more competitive in the market.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: With the emergence of deep learning techniques, smartphone apps are now embedded on-device AI features for enabling advanced tasks like speech translation, to attract users and increase market competitiveness. A good interaction design is important to make an AI feature usable and understandable. However, AI features have their unique challenges like sensitiveness to the input, dynamic behaviours and output uncertainty. Existing guidelines and tools either do not cover AI features or consider mobile apps which are confirmed by our informal interview with professional designers. To address these issues, we conducted the first empirical study to explore user-AI-interaction in mobile apps. We aim to understand the status of on-device AI usage by investigating 176 AI apps from 62,822 apps. We identified 255 AI features and summarised 759 implementations into three primary interaction pattern types. We further implemented our findings into a multi-faceted search-enabled gallery. The results of the user study demonstrate the usefulness of our findings.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Jul. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.00756v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The emergence of deep learning techniques has led to the integration of on-device AI features in smartphone apps. These AI features enable advanced tasks such as speech translation, which not only attract users but also increase market competitiveness. However, designing a good interaction for these AI features is crucial to ensure their usability and understandability. AI features pose unique challenges, including sensitiveness to input, dynamic behaviors, and output uncertainty. Unfortunately, existing guidelines and tools do not adequately address these challenges. This was confirmed through informal interviews with professional designers who pointed out that current guidelines either do not cover AI features or are focused on mobile apps in general. To address these issues, the authors conducted the first empirical study to explore user-AI interactions specifically in mobile apps. Their objective was to understand the current status of on-device AI usage by investigating 176 AI apps out of a total of 62,822 apps. Through their analysis, they identified 255 distinct AI features and summarized 759 implementations into three primary interaction pattern types. Building upon their findings, the authors developed a multi-faceted search-enabled gallery that incorporates their insights. The results of a user study conducted on this gallery demonstrated the usefulness and effectiveness of their findings. Overall, this research sheds light on the importance of designing effective interactions for on-device AI features in mobile apps. By addressing the unique challenges associated with these features – such as sensitiveness to input, dynamic behaviors and output uncertainty – developers can enhance user experience and make their apps more competitive in the market.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.