Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Uncertainty Estimation of Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Uncertainty Estimation Natural Language Generation Generative Inequalities Shifting Attention to Relevance

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Research conducted by Jinhao Duan et al. focuses on characterizing uncertainty in model generations produced by Large Language Models (LLMs) for Natural Language Generation.
  • Study reveals generative inequalities in reflecting the meaning of generations by auto-regressive LLMs, where some tokens are more relevant than others.
  • Tokens are equally valued during uncertainty estimation due to linguistic redundancy, even though not all tokens carry equal importance.
  • Proposed approach called Shifting Attention to more Relevant (SAR) components aims to address biases from generative inequalities at both token and sentence levels during uncertainty estimation.
  • Experiments involved popular LLMs like OPT and LLaMA, as well as commercial LLMs like Davinci from OpenAI, across various free-form question-answering tasks.
  • SAR demonstrated superior performance in mitigating biases caused by generative inequalities, as shown through experimental outcomes and detailed demographic analysis.
  • This research provides valuable insights for improving uncertainty estimation in Large Language Models for more reliable model outputs in Natural Language Generation tasks.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jinhao Duan, Hao Cheng, Shiqi Wang, Chenan Wang, Alex Zavalny, Renjing Xu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Kaidi Xu

Abstract: Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in Natural Language Generation, it is still challenging to characterize the uncertainty of model generations, i.e., when users could trust model outputs. Our research is derived from the heuristic facts that tokens are created unequally in reflecting the meaning of generations by auto-regressive LLMs, i.e., some tokens are more relevant (or representative) than others, yet all the tokens are equally valued when estimating uncertainty. It is because of the linguistic redundancy where mostly a few keywords are sufficient to convey the meaning of a long sentence. We name these inequalities as generative inequalities and investigate how they affect uncertainty estimation. Our results reveal that considerable tokens and sentences containing limited semantics are weighted equally or even heavily when estimating uncertainty. To tackle these biases posed by generative inequalities, we propose to jointly Shifting Attention to more Relevant (SAR) components from both the token level and the sentence level while estimating uncertainty. We conduct experiments over popular "off-the-shelf" LLMs (e.g., OPT, LLaMA) with model sizes up to 30B and powerful commercial LLMs (e.g., Davinci from OpenAI), across various free-form question-answering tasks. Experimental results and detailed demographic analysis indicate the superior performance of SAR. Code is available at https://github.com/jinhaoduan/shifting-attention-to-relevance.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.01379v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The research conducted by Jinhao Duan, Hao Cheng, Shiqi Wang, Chenan Wang, Alex Zavalny, Renjing Xu, Bhavya Kailkhura, and Kaidi Xu delves into the challenges of characterizing uncertainty in model generations produced by Large Language Models (LLMs) for Natural Language Generation. The study highlights the unequal creation of tokens in reflecting the meaning of generations by auto-regressive LLMs. It is found that some tokens are more relevant or representative than others. However, all tokens are equally valued when estimating uncertainty due to linguistic redundancy where a few keywords can convey the meaning of a long sentence. These inequalities are termed generative inequalities and are investigated for their impact on uncertainty estimation. The results of the research reveal that significant tokens and sentences with limited semantics are weighted equally or even heavily during uncertainty estimation. To address these biases stemming from generative inequalities, the authors propose a novel approach called Shifting Attention to more Relevant (SAR) components at both the token and sentence levels while estimating uncertainty. The experiments conducted involve popular "off-the-shelf" LLMs such as OPT and LLaMA with model sizes up to 30B as well as powerful commercial LLMs like Davinci from OpenAI across various free-form question-answering tasks. The experimental outcomes and detailed demographic analysis demonstrate the superior performance of SAR in mitigating biases caused by generative inequalities. This research contributes valuable insights towards improving uncertainty estimation in Large Language Models for more reliable model outputs in Natural Language Generation tasks. The code for implementing this approach is made available at https://github.com/jinhaoduan/shifting-attention-to-relevance.
Created on 02 May. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.