Generative Job Recommendations with Large Language Model
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Rapid development of online recruitment services
- Use of recommender systems to simplify job seeking process
- Current job recommendation models rely on collaborative filtering or person-job matching strategies
- Lack ability to provide explainable guidance to job seekers
- Limited potential as comprehensive career AI advisors
- Proposal of GIRL (GeneratIve job Recommendation based on Large language models)
- Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) strategy used to train LLM-based generator for crafting suitable Job Descriptions (JDs) based on CVs
- Training a model to evaluate degree of matching between CVs and JDs as reward model
- Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) used for further fine-tuning the generator based on recruiter feedback
- GIRL serves as a job seeker-centric generative model that provides personalized suggestions without relying on a candidate set
- Enhances performance of existing job recommendation models by supplementing job-seeking features with generated content
- Extensive experiments conducted on large-scale real-world dataset demonstrate effectiveness of GIRL
- Paradigm-shifting approach leveraging large language models in job recommendation systems
- Aims to foster improved and more tailored job-seeking experience for individuals.
Authors: Zhi Zheng, Zhaopeng Qiu, Xiao Hu, Likang Wu, Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong
Abstract: The rapid development of online recruitment services has encouraged the utilization of recommender systems to streamline the job seeking process. Predominantly, current job recommendations deploy either collaborative filtering or person-job matching strategies. However, these models tend to operate as "black-box" systems and lack the capacity to offer explainable guidance to job seekers. Moreover, conventional matching-based recommendation methods are limited to retrieving and ranking existing jobs in the database, restricting their potential as comprehensive career AI advisors. To this end, here we present GIRL (GeneratIve job Recommendation based on Large language models), a novel approach inspired by recent advancements in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs). We initially employ a Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) strategy to instruct the LLM-based generator in crafting suitable Job Descriptions (JDs) based on the Curriculum Vitae (CV) of a job seeker. Moreover, we propose to train a model which can evaluate the matching degree between CVs and JDs as a reward model, and we use Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) method to further fine-tine the generator. This aligns the generator with recruiter feedback, tailoring the output to better meet employer preferences. In particular, GIRL serves as a job seeker-centric generative model, providing job suggestions without the need of a candidate set. This capability also enhances the performance of existing job recommendation models by supplementing job seeking features with generated content. With extensive experiments on a large-scale real-world dataset, we demonstrate the substantial effectiveness of our approach. We believe that GIRL introduces a paradigm-shifting approach to job recommendation systems, fostering a more personalized and comprehensive job-seeking experience.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.