ConStaBL -- A Fresh Look at Software Engineering with State Machines
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Paper introduces an extended version of statechart visual modeling language for systems
- Incorporates local variables into statecharts and presents updated operational semantics with concurrency
- Strict semantics ensures no transition conflicts in simulations, allowing for more precise modeling and upstream analysis
- Supports arbitrary interleaving of concurrently executing action code, enhancing system modeling and analysis accuracy
- Presents operational semantics in the form of a simulation algorithm
- Defines conflicting transitions and valid simulations based on their semantics, establishing criteria for these definitions
- Executable semantics can be used to simulate statechart models and verify correctness
- Introduces fuzz testing of Statechart models as a novel concept lacking precedence in literature
- Preliminary setup using simulator and fuzzer successfully identifies issues challenging to discover through manual inspection alone
- Expands on existing research by incorporating local variables into modular statecharts and presenting updated operational semantics for concurrent statecharts
- Offers stricter constraints on transition conflicts while allowing flexible interleaving of action code execution
- Introduces fuzz testing as a means to identify potential issues in statechart models, providing valuable insights into system correctness beyond traditional inspection methods.
Authors: Karthika Venkatesan, Sujit Kumar Chakrabarti
Abstract: Statechart is a visual modelling language for systems. In this paper, we extend our earlier work on modular statecharts with local variables and present an updated operational semantics for statecharts with concurrency. Our variant of the statechart has local variables, which interact significantly with the remainder of the language semantics. Our semantics does not allow transition conflicts in simulations and is stricter than most other available semantics of statecharts in that sense. It allows arbitrary interleaving of concurrently executing action code, which allows more precise modelling of systems and upstream analysis of the same. We present the operational semantics in the form of the simulation algorithm. We also establish the criteria based on our semantics for defining conflicting transitions and valid simulations. Our semantics is executable and can be used to simulate statechart models and verify their correctness. We present a preliminary setup to carry out fuzz testing of Statechart models, an idea that does not seem to have a precedent in literature. We have used our simulator in conjunction with a well-known fuzzer to do fuzz testing of statechart models of non-trivial sizes and have found issues in them that would have been hard to find through inspection.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.