A Study on the Performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) in Simulating Depressed Individuals on the Standardized Depressive Symptom Scale

AI-generated keywords: Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) technology standardized depressive symptom scales accurately diagnosing depression depression-related assessment tools potential in aiding clinicians

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focused on evaluating GPT technology in simulating depressed individuals on standardized depressive symptom scales
  • Aimed to address challenges in diagnosing depression using current self-report and assessment scale methods
  • Three depression-related assessment tools used: HAMD-17, SDS, and GDS-15
  • Two experiments conducted to simulate GPT responses from normal individuals and those with depression
  • Results showed promising performance of GPT in assessing depression, aligning well with scoring criteria for both groups
  • Performance variations observed based on severity of depression, better on scales with higher sensitivity
  • GPT demonstrated potential for developing more effective depression scales
  • Further research warranted to explore leveraging GPT technology for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and supporting mental health care efforts
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sijin Cai, Nanfeng Zhang, Jiaying Zhu, Yanjie Liu, Yongjin Zhou

arXiv: 2307.08576v1 - DOI (q-bio.NC)
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Background: Depression is a common mental disorder with societal and economic burden. Current diagnosis relies on self-reports and assessment scales, which have reliability issues. Objective approaches are needed for diagnosing depression. Objective: Evaluate the potential of GPT technology in diagnosing depression. Assess its ability to simulate individuals with depression and investigate the influence of depression scales. Methods: Three depression-related assessment tools (HAMD-17, SDS, GDS-15) were used. Two experiments simulated GPT responses to normal individuals and individuals with depression. Compare GPT's responses with expected results, assess its understanding of depressive symptoms, and performance differences under different conditions. Results: GPT's performance in depression assessment was evaluated. It aligned with scoring criteria for both individuals with depression and normal individuals. Some performance differences were observed based on depression severity. GPT performed better on scales with higher sensitivity. Conclusion: GPT accurately simulates individuals with depression and normal individuals during depression-related assessments. Deviations occur when simulating different degrees of depression, limiting understanding of mild and moderate cases. GPT performs better on scales with higher sensitivity, indicating potential for developing more effective depression scales. GPT has important potential in depression assessment, supporting clinicians and patients.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.08576v1

In a study on the performance of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) technology in simulating depressed individuals on standardized depressive symptom scales, researchers aimed to address the challenges in diagnosing depression using current self-report and assessment scale methods. The study evaluated GPT's potential in accurately diagnosing depression by assessing its ability to simulate individuals with depression and examining the impact of different depression scales. Three depression-related assessment tools, including HAMD-17, SDS, and GDS-15, were utilized in the study. Two experiments were conducted to simulate GPT responses from both normal individuals and those with depression. The researchers compared GPT's responses with expected results, evaluated its understanding of depressive symptoms, and analyzed performance differences under various conditions. The results indicated that GPT demonstrated promising performance in assessing depression. It aligned well with scoring criteria for both individuals with depression and normal individuals. However, some performance variations were observed based on the severity of depression. Notably, GPT performed better on scales with higher sensitivity. In conclusion, the study found that GPT accurately simulated individuals with depression and normal individuals during assessments related to depression. While deviations occurred when simulating different degrees of depression, particularly limiting understanding of mild and moderate cases, GPT showed potential for developing more effective depression scales. This suggests that GPT technology has significant promise in aiding clinicians and patients in the assessment of depression. Further research is warranted to explore how this technology can be leveraged to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support mental health care efforts effectively. References 1. Thapar A., et al., Depression in young people. Lancet 2022; 400(10352): p. 617-631. 2. Takeda M., Tanaka T., Depression in the elderly. Geriatrics & Gerontology International 2010; 10(4): p. 277-279. 3. Greenberg P.E., et al., DEPRESSION - A NEGLECTED MAJOR ILLNESS. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1993; 54(11): p. 419-424. 4. Goldman L.S., ...
Created on 14 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.