Leveraging Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction via Online Text Data

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Mental Health Prediction Prompt Design Enhancements Instruction Finetuning Online Text Data

AI-generated Key Points

Recent surge of Large Language Models (LLMs) including GPT-3.5/4, PaLM, FLAN-T5, and Alpaca showing promising potential for various applications
Lack of research focusing on understanding and enhancing LLMs' capabilities in the mental health domain
Comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLMs specifically for mental health prediction tasks using online text data
Experiment results show that while LLMs show promise in mental health tasks, their performance is not yet comparable to task-specific NLP models
Prompt design enhancement strategies effective for critical action prediction tasks like suicide prediction
Instruction finetuning significantly improves the performance of LLMs across all mental health prediction tasks simultaneously
Best-finetuned model developed in the study - Mental-Alpaca - outperforms larger GPT-3.5 model by 16.7% on balanced accuracy and performs comparably to state-of-the-art task-specific models
Effectiveness of prompt design enhancements for mental health tasks and potential for further improvement through instruction finetuning highlighted
Utilization of four diverse mental health datasets to define six different mental health prediction tasks ranging from binary stress prediction to five-level suicide risk prediction at both post-level and user-level data

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xuhai Xu, Bingshen Yao, Yuanzhe Dong, Hong Yu, James Hendler, Anind K. Dey, Dakuo Wang

arXiv: 2307.14385v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: The recent technology boost of large language models (LLMs) has empowered a variety of applications. However, there is very little research on understanding and improving LLMs' capability for the mental health domain. In this work, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLMs, including Alpaca, Alpaca-LoRA, and GPT-3.5, on various mental health prediction tasks via online text data. We conduct a wide range of experiments, covering zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, and instruction finetuning. The results indicate the promising yet limited performance of LLMs with zero-shot and few-shot prompt designs for mental health tasks. More importantly, our experiments show that instruction finetuning can significantly boost the performance of LLMs for all tasks simultaneously. Our best-finetuned model, Mental-Alpaca, outperforms GPT-3.5 (25 times bigger) by 16.7\% on balanced accuracy and performs on par with the state-of-the-art task-specific model. We summarize our findings into a set of action guidelines for future researchers, engineers, and practitioners on how to empower LLMs with better mental health domain knowledge and become an expert in mental health prediction tasks.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.14385v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

The recent surge of Large Language Models (LLMs), including GPT-3.5/4, PaLM, FLAN-T5, and Alpaca, has shown promising potential for various applications. However, there is a lack of research focusing on understanding and enhancing LLMs' capabilities in the mental health domain. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLMs specifically for mental health prediction tasks using online text data. The experiments cover zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, and instruction finetuning to assess the performance of LLMs on mental health tasks. Results show that while LLMs show promise in these tasks, their performance is not yet comparable to task-specific NLP models. Through detailed experiments and analysis, it was found that prompt design enhancement strategies are effective for critical action prediction tasks like suicide prediction. Furthermore, instruction finetuning significantly improves the performance of LLMs across all mental health prediction tasks simultaneously. The best-finetuned model developed in this study - Mental-Alpaca - outperforms the larger GPT-3.5 model by 16.7% on balanced accuracy and performs comparably to state-of-the-art task-specific models. This research highlights key takeaways such as the effectiveness of prompt design enhancements for mental health tasks and the potential for further improvement through instruction finetuning. It also provides actionable guidelines for future researchers, engineers, and practitioners looking to enhance LLMs with better knowledge in the mental health domain and excel in mental health prediction tasks. Additionally, the study utilized four diverse mental health datasets - Dreaddit, DepSeverity, SDCNL, and CSSRS-Suicide - to define six different mental health prediction tasks ranging from binary stress prediction to five-level suicide risk prediction at both post-level and user-level data. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights into leveraging large language models for mental health prediction using online text data and highlights areas for further exploration and improvement in this important domain.

- Recent surge of Large Language Models (LLMs) including GPT-3.5/4, PaLM, FLAN-T5, and Alpaca showing promising potential for various applications
- Lack of research focusing on understanding and enhancing LLMs' capabilities in the mental health domain
- Comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLMs specifically for mental health prediction tasks using online text data
- Experiment results show that while LLMs show promise in mental health tasks, their performance is not yet comparable to task-specific NLP models
- Prompt design enhancement strategies effective for critical action prediction tasks like suicide prediction
- Instruction finetuning significantly improves the performance of LLMs across all mental health prediction tasks simultaneously
- Best-finetuned model developed in the study - Mental-Alpaca - outperforms larger GPT-3.5 model by 16.7% on balanced accuracy and performs comparably to state-of-the-art task-specific models
- Effectiveness of prompt design enhancements for mental health tasks and potential for further improvement through instruction finetuning highlighted
- Utilization of four diverse mental health datasets to define six different mental health prediction tasks ranging from binary stress prediction to five-level suicide risk prediction at both post-level and user-level data

Summary- Some new big language models like GPT-3.5/4, PaLM, FLAN-T5, and Alpaca are very good at doing different things. - Not many studies have looked at how these big language models can help with mental health. - People tested many of these big language models to see how well they can predict mental health stuff using text from the internet. - The tests showed that while these big language models are good for mental health tasks, they are not as good as other models made just for those tasks. - Making the questions better helps these big language models do better at predicting mental health stuff. Definitions- Language Models: Computer programs that can understand and generate human language. - Mental Health: How people think, feel, and behave when dealing with life's challenges. - Prediction Tasks: Trying to guess or figure out something before it happens based on available information. - NLP (Natural Language Processing) Models: Computer programs designed to understand and process human language.

The Potential of Large Language Models in Mental Health Prediction

The recent surge of large language models (LLMs) has sparked excitement and potential for various applications, including natural language processing (NLP) tasks. These models, such as GPT-3.5/4, PaLM, FLAN-T5, and Alpaca, have shown impressive capabilities in generating human-like text and performing well on a range of NLP tasks. However, there is a lack of research focusing specifically on understanding and enhancing LLMs for mental health prediction tasks. In response to this gap in the literature, a team of researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLMs for mental health prediction using online text data. Their study aimed to assess the performance of LLMs on various mental health tasks through zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, and instruction finetuning techniques.

Understanding Mental Health Prediction Tasks

Before delving into the details of this research paper's findings and implications, it is essential to understand what mental health prediction tasks entail. The study utilized four diverse mental health datasets - Dreaddit, DepSeverity, SDCNL, and CSSRS-Suicide - to define six different prediction tasks: 1. Binary stress prediction: Predicting whether an individual's post expresses high or low levels of stress. 2. Multi-class depression severity prediction: Predicting the level of depression severity based on an individual's post. 3. Multi-class anxiety severity prediction: Predicting the level of anxiety severity based on an individual's post. 4. Binary suicide risk at post-level: Predicting whether an individual's post indicates suicidal ideation or not. 5. Five-level suicide risk at user-level: Predicting the overall suicide risk level for an individual based on their posts. 6. Five-level critical action prediction at user-level: Predicting whether an individual will take critical actions, such as self-harm or suicide attempts. These tasks cover a range of mental health concerns and provide a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs' performance in this domain.

Experiment Design and Results

The researchers conducted experiments using three different techniques: zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, and instruction finetuning. Zero-shot prompting involves providing the model with a prompt that describes the task without any additional training data. Few-shot prompting involves providing the model with a small amount of training data for the specific task. Instruction finetuning involves fine-tuning the entire model on multiple mental health prediction tasks simultaneously. The results showed that while LLMs show promise in these tasks, their performance is not yet comparable to task-specific NLP models. However, through detailed analysis and experimentation, several key takeaways were identified: 1. Prompt design enhancements are effective for critical action prediction tasks like suicide prediction. 2. Instruction finetuning significantly improves the performance of LLMs across all mental health prediction tasks simultaneously. 3. The best-finetuned model developed in this study - Mental-Alpaca - outperforms even larger models like GPT-3.5 by 16.7% on balanced accuracy and performs comparably to state-of-the-art task-specific models. These findings highlight the potential for further improvement in LLMs' capabilities for mental health prediction through prompt design enhancements and instruction finetuning techniques.

Implications for Future Research

This research provides valuable insights into leveraging large language models for mental health prediction using online text data. It also offers actionable guidelines for future researchers, engineers, and practitioners looking to enhance LLMs' knowledge in the mental health domain and excel in these important prediction tasks. One key implication is that prompt design plays a crucial role in improving LLMs' performance on critical action prediction tasks like suicide risk assessment. Further research in this area could explore different prompt designs and their impact on LLMs' performance. Additionally, the study utilized four diverse mental health datasets to evaluate LLMs' performance on various tasks. Future research could expand on this by incorporating more datasets and exploring how different types of data (e.g., social media posts, online forums, therapy transcripts) may affect LLMs' performance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this research paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of multiple LLMs for mental health prediction tasks using online text data. Through detailed experiments and analysis, it highlights the potential for further improvement in LLMs' capabilities through prompt design enhancements and instruction finetuning techniques. The findings also provide valuable insights into leveraging large language models for mental health prediction and offer actionable guidelines for future research in this important domain.

Created on 08 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.